Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

ECO and its future as a non-Arab regional bloc

By Abolghasem Bayyenat - posted Wednesday, 5 January 2011

The Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO), comprising Iran, Turkey, Pakistan, Afghanistan and six Muslim former Soviet republics, recently held its latest summit meeting in Istanbul, Turkey, where President Ahmadinejad handed over the rotating presidency of this regional organization to President Abdullah Gul of Turkey.

ECO is a low-profile regional economic integration organization, headquartered in Tehran, which was originally founded by Iran, Turkey and Pakistan . Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, ECO expanded its membership to the Muslim Central Asian republics of the former Soviet Union as well as Afghanistan.

ECO has so far gained modest achievements in the area of commercial and economic cooperation among its members despite a plethora of preferential commercial and economic agreements signed among its member states over the past two decades.


The three founding members of ECO act as the key players of this regional organization as most of the acceded members still remain uncertain about the benefits of deeper regional integration within ECO.

Turkey’s role in ECO is primarily driven by its interests in gaining preferential access to the markets of other member states, a fact which explains why it is the major driving force behind trade liberalization in the ECO region. Iran initially weighed political benefits from regional integration under ECO more heavily in its calculations than its potential economic gains, as it provided Iran a break from isolation by its hostile neighbouring Arab countries in the 1980s.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Iran has also viewed ECO as a framework for promoting its geopolitical position as a transit route for the land-locked Central Asian republics. Increased international diplomatic pressure on Iran over its nuclear program in recent years has increased the political stake of ECO in Iran’s eyes.

Two major developments are particularly noteworthy about the latest ECO summit held in Istanbul.

First, the attendance of Iraqi president Jalal Talabani as the head of a non-member state at the ECO summit was a new development for this regional grouping. Talabani’s attendance makes particular sense in light of the fact that Iraq has officially applied for membership in ECO. Membership of Iraq in ECO would mark a break from the non-Arab identity of this regional organization and would pave the way for the membership of some other Arab countries in this organization.

In light of the geographical interconnectedness of Iraq with other key ECO member states, ECO would serve as a natural setting for the regional economic integration of Iraq . Iraq’s integration within a non-Arab regional bloc may ring the alarm bell for conservative Arab sheikdoms in the Persian Gulf region as it highlights further alienation of Iraq from these countries due to their antagonistic policies toward the post-conflict democratic Iraq and their reluctance to accept Iraq in the (Persian) Gulf Cooperation Council.


Regardless of regional reactions , by seeking membership in ECO, Iraq has taken a major step in using regional capacities to promote its national interests.

The second major development highlighting the latest ECO summit in Istanbul, is the continued lukewarm attitude of most Central Asian republics toward deeper economic integration within ECO, as demonstrated by their low-level presence at this meeting. Apart from Azerbaijan and Tajikistan, none of the remaining Central Asian members of ECO participated at the head of state level in this meeting.

This fact just further highlights these countries’ uncertainties about potential economic gains from deeper economic integration in the ECO region. Their lukewarm attitude is driven by their fear that deeper economic integration, promoted as the main objective of ECO, would leave their domestic markets at the mercy of the more competitive producers of key ECO member states, primarily those of Turkey and to a lesser extent Iran and Pakistan.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Abolghasem Bayyenat is an independent political analyst and is currently completing his Ph.D studies in political science at Syracuse University. His articles and commentaries have appeared in a dozen of newspapers and online journals. He has also recently launched his weblog Iran Diplomacy Watch, where he will be covering Iran’s foreign policy developments on a regular basis.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Abolghasem Bayyenat

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Abolghasem Bayyenat
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy