Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Why online journals haven’t made a dint … yet

By Graham Young - posted Friday, 15 March 2002


Financial models aren’t the only problems for online publishing. Marshall McLuhan divided media into hot and cold – the more attention the medium demanded from its user, the hotter it was. TV was hot, radio cold. Of all the media, Internet is hottest. Not only do you have to sit down to read it, but unlike radio or TV, it is interactive. Also unlike radio or TV it is a one-on-one experience: one user per screen. The intensity of the experience implies that fewer people will use it for smaller period of time than other media, meaning a smaller audience measured in hours per person per day.

There is another limiting factor for ’net-based publications – their lack of portability. You can’t take them on the train or read them in bed. Again, maybe Salon is showing the way here. As part of their subscriber service (only $30 US per year) you are given the right to download and print-off a version of Salon that you can take with you. One future for the internet based publication may be as a hard copy publication distributed via telephone wires.

However, while independent overseas Internet journals are starting to make it, the future is much less certain in Australia. The first problem is the size of the market. Let us assume that Salon’s 35,000 subscribers come solely from the US and then multiply it by 19 million (the population of Australia) and divide by 280 million (the population of the US). That yields an Australian equivalent figure of 2,375 subscribers, just less than the number of subscribers Stephen Mayne claims for Crikey!. But Mayne’s $108,000 a year is not enough to sustain his one-man show, let alone pay his contributors and produce a return on capital. Salon, on the other hand, with similar market penetration, has the funds to hire columnists and commentators like Camille Paglia, Arianna Huffington and David Horowitz. What market penetration would an Aussie eJournal have to achieve to be able to afford to hire talent like that, and make a profit?

Advertisement

Another problem is the lack of an entrepreneurial culture in Australia or entrepreneurs with significantly deep pockets. Who is going to throw millions of dollars into an Internet product that may rack up tens of millions of losses for years before becoming profitable? Perhaps Kerry Packer at the height of the tech boom might have been prepared, but then that would just be surrender to the old media.

There will be solutions to the economic puzzle of Internet publishing and in some ways the experiences of Crikey!, Zeitgeist Gazette and OLO are more significant than that of Salon or TheStreet.com because there are many more national markets with populations of 20 million than there are with populations of 280 million. The steeper challengers that we face are therefore more typical for the world. The internet is a beautiful, supple medium for news, current affairs and opinion. By paying closer attention to readers’ needs independent North American publications are starting to make it. Australian ones must do the same.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young
Related Links
About On Line Opinion
Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy