Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Watch this space: the new National Congress of Australia’s First Peoples

By Edward Cavanagh - posted Friday, 8 October 2010


Can the NCAFP achieve the two goals it has set out for itself? Will it become a powerful and independent think tank with real sway, at the same time as a pan-Indigenous (and un-homogenising) forum for the entire country? Time will tell - and time is what they need.

We should therefore be encouraged by the pledge of the Congress Co-Chair, Dr Kerry Arabena (Meriam), that “This is a long term proposition”. If she’s right, private enterprise, federal and state policy designers, and even local councils, will need to be keep an eye on the NCAFP. If she’s right, then the political discourse that emanates from the many pockets of Indigenous Australia - one that attracts attention to specifities but at the same time capitalises from a sense of pan-Indigeneity - can only strengthen. And only then will such a discourse permeate through those many misjudged preoccupations held in trust by our 21st century politicians, and make a mark on the mainstream media.

Perhaps this is all a bit overly optimistic. There are many impediments before the NCAFP, foremost among them set by the progenitors themselves. If Federal Government grants are to remain the main source of funding for the organisation, the NCAFP will probably run into some interpretative dilemmas down the track. And if the Federal Government simply ignores the NCAFP’s findings, and endorses only those it deems safe and inexpensive, then there will be no real purpose for it in the first place.

Advertisement

I suppose we better watch this space - and keep our fingers crossed. Federal Aboriginal policy in this country is so tidal (and even the smallest initiatives of this type are monitored with the highest levels of scrutiny), that the odds are already against the NCAFP even before it even gets going.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Published in the Canberra Times on October 11, 2010.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Edward Cavanagh studies indigenous-settler relationships, and is the managing editor of an academic journal called settler colonial studies. He follows, and occasionally comments upon, developments in Indigenous affairs and education policy.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Edward Cavanagh

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Edward Cavanagh
Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy