Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Food security - what security?

By John Le Mesurier - posted Wednesday, 22 September 2010


Conclusion

Farming and marketing practices can be reformed to produce crops more efficiently and reduce waste but there is little sign that such measures are being instituted.

The productivity of some land might be improved through use of bio-char but fundamental challenges posed by increasingly expensive and scarce fertilisers needed to increase production have not been overcome.

The loss of arable land due to global warming and the needs of rapidly growing global and regional populations, the destruction of habitat, both marine and land, can only be reversed by acting to stop their causes. Too little effective action is being taken.

Advertisement

An obvious measure is to curtail population growth. This is occurring naturally in many the developed countries and is legislated in China but most countries either refuse to adopt such measures, are unable or unwilling to enforce them, or are confronted by religious opposition to them. Some countries even promote population growth by offering financial and other incentives to parents and by increasing their migration intake.

How will a population expected to reach 10 billion within the next 50 years be fed? The answer is quite simple: it will not - and we know it. Billions will starve, particularly in countries vulnerable to the effects described above.

Mass population movements will occur as those most threatened by food shortages and reduced ability to produce it attempt to reach more prosperous parts. Resistance from the people of those parts could lead to wars and political instability. For many the future is bleak.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

45 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John Le Mesurier born in Sydney and educated at State Schools, then TAFE where he completed a course in accountancy. John is now employed as an accountant with responsibility for audit and budget performance. He has no science qualifications but has read extensively on the topics of global warming and climate change, both the views of scientists and sceptics.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Le Mesurier

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 45 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy