Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

The key to power

By Gilbert Holmes - posted Wednesday, 25 August 2010

With power so delicately balanced between Labor and the coalition, an unlikely alliance between the Greens and the various independent MPs is one of the few outcomes that have the capacity to deliver stable governance for Australia, most probably for Gillard’s Labor.

If it were workable, an alliance would be very desirable for the Greens and Independents as it would have the potential to maximise their influence, as well as the duration of that influence, within the government.

With the Green Adam Bandt apparently lefter than left, and the ex-Nationals Tony Windsor, Bob Katter and Rob Oakeshott apparently righter than right, it would appear on the surface that there is little common ground for this alliance, but such is not the case.


We can see that the Greens and the various Independents have all built their reputations on promoting community (and environmental) outcomes ahead of any ideological pursuit of economic efficiency. Subsequently, much common ground can be found in the various community development and economic management strategies that they offer.

Specifically, central to a policy platform around which they could build a mutually beneficial alliance would be policies that encourage the interdependence and vibrancy of communities at the local level through the promotion of economic diversity and local self-reliance.

Packaged correctly, such policies would be attractive to the three ex-nationals because they would have the potential of helping to bring life back to the country towns; helping small farmers to stay on the land and reversing the population decline.

They would also be attractive to the Greens as local self-reliance means local employment, local production of (hopefully organic) food, local management of resources and wastes, etc, all of which have the potential to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions and other impacts on the environment.

As both the Greens and Bob Katter especially realise, policies such as these actually fly directly in the face of the dominant economic philosophy embraced by the major parties - the “free market”. Free trade tends to encourage specialisation rather than diversity, big business rather than small, and a focus on exports/imports rather than local self-reliance and community interdependence.

On his website, Bob Katter tells us, “Paul Keating is one of the most important people in Australian history. The architect of economic rationalism, a term tagged to Gough Whitlam's 25 per cent across the board cut in tariffs. Paul Keating abolished the Wool Marketing Scheme resulting in the price being traded down 50 per cent. The price had doubled when Dough Authority introduced the scheme.”


And concerning the National Party, “Their craving for acceptability by big business, National media, Canberra's dominant political entities Liberal and Labor, led them to decide to tell us that free market policies were good for rural Australia”.

Also, “And finally developmentalism - the free marketeers tell us ‘private enterprise must do it’. Government money provided and created the sugar industry, aluminium industry, coal industry and car industry. There wouldn't be much Australian economy if Governments had listened to this foolishness in years past.”

Meanwhile, looking at the Greens policies, we find that they will, “... pursue economic development strategies that encourage self-reliance and prioritise the sustainable production of goods and services from local sources”.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

7 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Thirty-something Gilbert Holmes lives with his wife Catherine in Brisbane. They are expecting their first child. Gilbert has a long standing interest in yin-yang polarity, and most recently has turned his attentions to understand polarity in relation to political and economic philosophy. He is working on a book on this subject. Gilbert is an advocate of a decentralised, direct democratic society, with a balanced, cooperative/competitive economic system. You can read more at

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Gilbert Holmes

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 7 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy