Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Climate change: what would have Edward Theodore done?

By Ken McKay - posted Thursday, 19 August 2010


So we introduce the rationing framework, we use public funds to establish a publicly owned company to invest in low emission and renewables technology. In turn, this will force the existing energy sector to devote concentrated investment into both low emission and renewable technology.

Just one nation setting in place a framework to fundamentally change the energy sector nationwide will set a beacon for those concerned about global warming right around the world.

It will devote their attention to real, significant and guaranteed changes, rather than establishing a price for carbon and hoping that the invisible hand of the market will squeeze carbon out of the atmosphere.

Advertisement

We need to say to the activists hoping for a better world that just as the Chicago School of Economics is not the answer to achieve full employment, just as the Chicago School is not the answer to establish fair wages, just as the Chicago School is not the answer in providing a fair education system, the Chicago School provides no answer for global warming and climate change.

We need to reject carbon pricing and emissions trading schemes, we need a democratic socialist solution because the market and price mechanism alone will not challenge global warming.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

8 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ken McKay is a former Queensland Ministerial Policy Adviser now working in the Queensland Union movement. The views expressed in this article are his views and do not represent the views of past or current employers.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ken McKay

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ken McKay
Article Tools
Comment 8 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy