The answer is c). However, this response contains an error as the language convention requires a comma before the coordinating conjunction “so”. The tests are inconsistent in their application of this rule. For example, in item 28 of the Year 3 test, it is clear that the test writers understand that a compound sentence using the conjunction “so” is preceded by a comma (It was a secret, so he promised to keep it to himself.). Why is the rule not applied in the Year 5 test item? How should teachers guide their students in this regard?
Item 31 of the Year 3 paper asks students to identify the correct punctuation for the sentence “________________ they caught something big.” Possible answers are:
a) one day
b) one day,
c) One day
d) One Day,
Advertisement
All of these answers are wrong. The correct answer should be “One day,” because “one day” is an introducer, which must be followed by a comma.
Similarly, the rule is not applied properly in item 27, in which students are asked “Which words correctly complete this sentence?”: Tomorrow we ___________________ to the park. “Tomorrow” is an introducer, so it should be followed by a comma. Should teachers ignore this convention?
Item 47 of the Year 5 test asks “Which group of words can all be conjunctions?” The choices are:
a) his, hers, its, theirs
b) after, before, while, then
c) plays, speaks, drinks, eats
d) may, must, should, might
The obvious answer is b) because in a) the words are all pronouns, in c) they are verbs, and in d) they are modal verbs. However, the word “then”, which is included in b), is an adverb, not a conjunction. If two main clauses are joined by “then”, the word “then” must be preceded by a conjunction such as “and” or “but” or “because”. Otherwise, a run-on sentence is created, which is grammatically quite incorrect, but a common structure produced by students. Importantly, the other words in b) can perform the function of an adverb, a preposition or a conjunction. The word “then” can only act as an adverb. Have the item writers perhaps confused “then” with “than”? The latter is also a preposition and a conjunction, and is also frequently misused.
According to a recent article in Education Review (May 2010), every test item “is reviewed by every state and territory as well as experts in indigenous education, experts in education for students from language backgrounds other than English, students who have a visual impairment and other experts in teaching and learning for students with disabilities.” The statement says that “The purpose of this review is to make sure that the final set of test items that are printed and delivered to schools are accessible to the widest possible proportion of students.” Numerous items in the tests do not make their pedagogical purpose clear, or appear to be testing points of grammar that are likely to be most accessible to students from native English speaking backgrounds and/or families that are able to encourage more sophisticated language usage.
Advertisement
In the Year 5 test, item 41 asks students to identify “Which word or words correctly complete the sentence?” The sentence is: It is requested that all phones ___________ turned off during the show.” The choices are:
a) be
b) being
c) are being
d) have been
The answer is a). Is this question testing the use of the subjunctive? How many students in Year 5 would be aware of the correct application of this mood? How would students be taught this? It is interesting to note that the word “are” is not one of the options, even though the indicative is common usage, particularly in spoken English.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
3 posts so far.
About the Authors
Elizabeth Grant BA, Grad Dip (TESOL), MA (TESOL) worked with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade for over 20 years before moving to Seoul and then Shanghai to teach English as a Second Language. Since 2002, she has been based in Canberra, co-ordinating and teaching English language and communication skills programs for university students. In 2005, she participated in a major research project to investigate undergraduates’ perceptions of the extent to which their experience of English in K-12 prepared them for their tertiary courses. Liz’s professional experience in Europe, Asia and Australia has made her very aware of the value of language awareness training for both native and non-native speakers of English.
Dr Fiona Mueller is a teacher of English and foreign languages and a former Head of ANU College at the Australian National University. In 2016-2017, she was Director of Curriculum at the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). She is particularly interested in the history of education, international education, single-sex schooling and K-12 curriculum design.