Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Tyranny by treaty

By Teresa Platt - posted Monday, 28 June 2010

Every trade association in the United States is attempting to understand what carbon trading and taxation will mean for its constituents. And while some are standing by hoping to receive subsidies from the scheme, many are concerned we are heading in the wrong direction.

At the United Nations conference on climate change in Copenhagen last December, 40,000 protestors, 30,000 delegates and 100 world leaders slept in flophouses and four-star hotels. They rented 1,200 limousines and 140 private jets. The US delegation consisted of 200 people, not including President Obama’s massive entourage of 500.

In just 14 days, this one UN conference spewed 40,000 tons of CO2 into the atmosphere - more than that produced annually by 60 of the world’s smallest economies!


It is estimated that, over the last 20 years, climate change has sucked up $80 billion in US taxpayer funds. So one must ask, “Did they really all have to go?”

UN Project #1901

To mitigate all the hot air produced at this one UN meeting, a UN treaty and the EU law force Denmark’s citizens to buy 40,000 tons worth of UN-certified emission reductions (UNCERs) at a cost of $700,000. Annually, Denmark purchases another 115,000 tons worth of UNCERs for $2 million a year. All of Denmark’s UNCERs are bought from UN Project #1901.

Project #1901 is 100 acres of new brick-making businesses in Bangladesh. At current rates, over the 20-year lifespan of these brickfields, Denmark will transfer $40 million in mitigation fees to Project #1901. Bangladesh carbon marketers have announced that this price will double, bringing the total of this “developed to developing country” transfer to $80 million over 20 years.

It cost only $9 million to build Project #1901, with an $11 million World Bank credit line issued to a private finance company. So before making a single brick, the investors in Project #1901 have secured tens of millions in profits, all risk free.

Project #1901 is just one of thousands of such projects triggered by UN treaty and paid for by overburdened taxpayers in developed countries, with the US paying the largest share, fully 22 per cent of the bill.

You can track activity for some UN environmental treaties via the UN Global Environment Facility’s (GEF) database at Searching by keyword “brick”, you’ll see Project #1901 is one of three such projects in Bangladesh, India and China; projects totaling $52 million, paid for by income taxed, then transferred, from developed countries to developing countries, with the UN and the World Bank acting as facilitators.


Each UN meeting requires carbon mitigation and more cash goes to more UN projects. Every protester equals more carbon equals more mitigation equals more cash. Never mind selling T-shirts to conventioneers anymore. There’s definitely more money in selling UNCERs.

Meet the UN

A generous people, every year US citizens personally donate $70 billion in charity to developing countries, plus another $23 billion via our government’s humanitarian arm, USAID.

Beyond this, we support various UN agency budgets. And we support the World Bank which, since 2008, has transferred more than $100 billion from 40 “rich” countries for financing and grants to 144 developing countries. At the World Bank, Communist China has just leapfrogged past Germany, France and the UK to become the third largest shareholder, just behind the US and Japan. And India’s not far behind.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

This is an abridged version of Teresa Platt’s  report. For the full version visit

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

13 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

The daughter of an agricultural banker, Teresa Platt has been involved in food and fiber production for over three decades. Teresa has experience in marketing and management, public relations and government affairs. To learn more, google “Teresa Platt” or visit her on Facebook. Teresa blogs at and you can reach her in California at

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 13 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy