Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Dead in the water

By Kellie Tranter - posted Monday, 31 May 2010


You will also be aware that the Act defines "water industry infrastructure" as water infrastructure or sewerage infrastructure, and that "water infrastructure" essentially means any infrastructure that is, or is to be, used for the production, treatment, filtration, storage, conveyance or reticulation of water but does not include any pipe, fitting or apparatus that is situated downstream of a customer’s connection point to a water main, or any pipe, fitting or apparatus that is situated upstream of a customer’s connection point to a stormwater drain.

Where exactly does this leave the current and any future State government if it becomes necessary to cancel a licence in the interests of the public?

The Auditor-General’s Report to Parliament 2009 Volume 7 says that “... In May 2009, the NSW Government announced that the first licences have been issued under the Act. It issued the first licence to construct, maintain and operate a new recycled water plant at Fairfield as part of the Rosehill Recycling Scheme. This scheme will initially provide 4.3 billion litres of recycled water a year to industrial and irrigation customers in Western Sydney. A second licence was issued to allow high quality recycled water to be transported to users through a network of retrofitted gas pipes ...”

Advertisement

Is it appropriate that Ministers, rather than an independent body, have the ultimate power to grant and cancel licences?

Has the NSW government actually put in place a water industry code of conduct, a marketing code of conduct and a transfer code of conduct for the transfer of water supplies or sewerage services to, from or between licensed retail suppliers before handing over to "private" players the keys to our most importance resource? If not, why not?

Receipt of my letter was acknowledged but I am still awaiting a reply.

I entirely support the ASU’s call for all contenders at the next election to specifically state their position.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

15 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Kellie Tranter is a lawyer and human rights activist. You can follow her on Twitter @KellieTranter

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Kellie Tranter

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Kellie Tranter
Article Tools
Comment 15 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy