Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Buddhism and Science

By Ian Nance - posted Wednesday, 21 April 2010


One hears so much about what science can do, yet so little about what it cannot do.

Scientific knowledge is limited to those data received through the sense organs, and does not recognise the reality which transcends sense-data.

Scientific truth is built upon logical observations which are changing constantly. It is therefore relative truth not intended to stand the test of time, and a scientist aware of this fact is always willing to discard a theory if it can be replaced by a better one.

Advertisement

Science attempts to understand the outer world, but has barely scratched the surface of man’s inner world.

Today, so many people are plagued with fear, restlessness, and insecurity, yet science fails to succour them. It is unable to teach the common man how to control his mind when he is driven by the nature which burns within him.

Science is thoroughly secular in nature and unconcerned with man’s spiritual goal, denying to his psyche anything higher than material satisfaction.

The transcendental mind developed by Buddha is not limited to sense-data, and goes beyond the logic bounded by the limits of relative perception.

On the contrary, human intellect operates on the basis of information it collects and stores, whether in the field of religion, philosophy, science, or art. This information is gathered by our sense organs which are inferior in many ways, and the very limited information perceived makes our understanding of the world distorted.

The less we know, the more certain we are in our explanations. The more we know, the more we realise our limitations. In this regard, Socrates had this to say when asked what he knew: “I know only one thing – that I do not know!”

Advertisement

Buddhism goes beyond modern science in its acceptance of a wider field of knowledge than is allowed by the scientific mind. It admits knowledge arising from the sense organs, as well as personal experiences gained through mental culture, and by training and developing a highly concentrated mind, spiritual experience can be understood and verified.

This experience is not something which can be understood by conducting experiments in a test tube, or examined under the microscope.

The truth disclosed by science is relative, and subject to change, while that found by the Buddha is final and absolute – it does not change according to time and space and is known by its Sanskrit name, Dhamma.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

25 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ian Nance's media career began in radio drama production and news. He took up TV direction of news/current affairs, thence freelance television and film producing, directing and writing. He operated a program and commercial production company, later moving into advertising and marketing.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ian Nance

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ian Nance
Article Tools
Comment 25 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy