No Order of Australia for those who are not seen

Before the newly elected Whitlam government rushed to get rid of regally bestowed titles, Harold Holt’s widow (now deceased herself) became Dame Zara. The gong for this one-time head of a fashion business located in Toorak was for what was vaguely described as “devotion to the public interest”.

Whatever Zara did in the public interest, it was under the right light to be seen. The devotion to the public interest of a nurse who has been working staggered shifts for 20 years is not.

Even if such blatant exploitation of privileged position is behind us, we still feel the need to select individuals for honours when it is impossible to do this fairly. Today you can be nominated by anybody for any one of four levels of the Order of Australia.

John Winston Howard has received the highest honour; Companion of the Order of Australia for services to the nation. After years of six-star accommodation, personal jet globe-trotting and dining with the famous - and then his golden parachute, why the honour?

It is because the current honours process is still primarily the establishment handing down a badge to establishment people as a type of mutual congratulation.

No gong possible for this man

He had a bright future as an engineer if he had continued with his studies when a young man. But, he decided to walk away and do what he could to save the old growth forests. Batch camping in the forest is a unique way of life which the establishment labels as weird and useless. His drop-out condemned him to a life not far removed from subsistence. I will call him “Platypus”.

The strategy is to obstruct the progress of the loggers, and, hopefully, attract some media attention. This is dangerous. It is a frightening experience, while chained to some heavy equipment, being surrounded by rough men who would like to see you dead. It is also dangerous spending days on a small platform 30 metres above the ground. The police are then dragged into the confrontation.

The loggers have a valid point of view - they have to make a living. It is not a perfectly valid point of view as there are alternative occupations to that of destroying ecosystems which evolved to their current equilibrium state an unknown number of millennia back.

I met Platypus through his mother, and I came particularly interested in what he was doing after she tearfully told me of her concern for his thinness, his occasional loneliness and the cold winters he was enduring. My concern was that once a young person drops out of society, it can be hard getting back in again.

With such irreparable destruction occurring, it would be a fair guess that Victoria’s Department of Sustainability and Environment did not understand what its job was supposed to be. Platypus decided to do some systematic investigating.

After more than five years of Magistrates courts, the County Court, the Supreme Court and then back to the County Court, the finding was in favour of a case put forward by Platypus and his mate. Their allegation was that the department was operating in breach of the law. As I read the description of that battle by men who had no legal background, I stand in awe.

In the long term it is all so futile. Politicians know that the bulk of the electorate will not care that logging Gippsland will drive what few Powerful Owls remain to extinction. Modern man does not need species few have ever heard of - but he does need woodchips.

At age 40, Platypus is now gradually re-entering mainstream society, as he must do, but his mission took the best years out of his life.

 
Our “feral” knights besides the mid-section (not the largest part) of a tragic loss for all of us

Conclusion

Later this year there will be highly polished people gathered on the lawns of our government houses. With their newly awarded bits of metal hanging on them, most will be puffed-up with the pride of knowing that the establishment has judged them to be superior people.

Far removed from that salubrious environment will be a man who owns almost nothing. He has sacrificed a profession and parenthood. He did this knowing that there will be no personal gain for the making of that sacrifice either in this world or the next.

How could any person love this land so much?

Footnotes

The activists don’t live in the forest continually, but try to find odd jobs while ready to return to the forest when alerted. The general lack of income and the shifting of habitats in a continual need to find a roof over their heads is a difficult lifestyle.

They claim that the logging industry primarily exists to keep those who live in nearby towns employed, as the woodchip industry earns very few export dollars for this country. Could it be true that we have people destroying 10,000-year old ecosystems just to keep them occupied?

Jack Mundey’s confrontational green bans in Sydney were stunningly successful in spite of unionists being traditionally scorned upon by the media. But the citizenry were familiar with what was being fought for. Direct obstructionist methods fail when the mass of the public cannot relate to what they have not experienced.