Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here’s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The reality paradigm: policy possibilities and limitations

By Chris Lewis - posted Tuesday, 17 February 2009


In an On Line Opinion piece “The Age of Reason” (January 15, 2009), David Young stated:

I used to believe that we lived in the age of reason. An age when we learn from experience and an age where we change the way we do things as we learn. I believed that science and technology could lead us to a world of prosperity for all; where wars would cease as scarcity diminished. But that was years ago.

This article - while also acknowledging the many problems confronting humanity - provides an alternative view by highlighting the ongoing reality of policy possibilities and limitations.

Advertisement

It is not hard to find evidence of humanity’s progress aided by the development of science and technology. For instance, while war and famine remain evident, the average human lifespan has increased from 22-25 years during the Roman Empire, to about 30 years in 1900, 64 years by 1980 and 66 in recent years. In Australia, the average lifespan has improved from about 52 years during 1891-1900 to about 80 years.

Even allowing for the environmental effects of greater insecticide and fertiliser use, much greater global food production has helped meet the nutritional needs of a rapidly growing world population (1.65 billion in 1900 to 6.7 billion in 2008).

And for those of us who believe in the positive role of government, there are many national examples that demonstrate a much fairer distribution of resources than previous centuries in regards to a society’s social policy needs, as shaped by ongoing interaction with interest groups and public opinion. Despite recent trends towards lower taxation rates for high-income earners and corporations, most Western societies have maintained a reasonable balance between government intervention and market forces as illustrated by an ongoing commitment to maintain a decent social welfare system.

There is also the reality that many societies have increasingly adopted progressive policies on race, gender, sexuality and even the environment.

In addition, polls show that a majority of nations accept that democracy is the most appropriate political system to enable a nation to encourage and maintain cohesion and meet its various economic, social and environmental needs.

Of course, with increasing concern about income disparity and environmental degradation at both the national and international levels, there is an obvious need for better policy ideas.

Advertisement

But, if one notes that progress can be slow, it is much wiser for a commentator to recognise policy limitations rather than blaming policy failure on people’s irrationality, inability, or reluctance to accept new ideas.

While we criticise our own national political leaders (with some even suggesting that corporations run society and determine who will lead the country), most of us look to our major political parties to uphold the national interest in these difficult times of ongoing economic reform.

If we accept the relevance of nations, it remains a reality that a society must organise itself in way conducive to it benefiting from its interaction with the international economy in order to prosper and meet its various economic, social and environmental needs.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

16 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Chris Lewis has an interest in all economic, social and environmental issues, but believes that the struggle for the ‘right’ policy mix remains an elusive goal in such a complex and competitive world.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Chris Lewis

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 16 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy