Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Decay in a time of penury

By Des Griffin - posted Friday, 19 September 2008


Sydney Morning Herald finance editor Ross Gittins, talking not too long ago, of the changes Treasurer Michael Egan was making to the structure of the budget said of the focus on debt:

… this is a hugely parsimonious way to conduct the state's finances, insisting that the current generation of taxpayers cover the full cost of new general government capital works - hospitals, schools, roads etc - that will still be delivering services to taxpayers 20 or 30 years hence and catch up on the repayment of debt incurred to fund the capital works of previous generations.

He continued:

Advertisement

But why is such parsimony necessary? It never was. Unlike some other states, NSW (like the Commonwealth) never went overboard and so never had an excessive level of debt. If it ever had excessive debt it wouldn't have retained its triple A credit rating. And I doubt that rating was ever under threat. In any case, if you've sworn off borrowing why does your credit rating matter?

More recently, Ian McAuley (in the Centre for Policy Development online in November 2007) observed, “Evidence of infrastructure neglect surrounds us whenever we drive on a highway or catch a suburban train … People feel insecure in their employment, and are wondering why, if we are so prosperous, we have to work such long hours.”

That we should be contemplating “pushing out” infrastructure plans, especially in the areas of public transport and energy in the face of impending global climate change, in education with ever greater demands on a knowledge economy, and on hospitals, is irresponsible.

Credit ratings

Professor of Accounting at the University of Sydney Bob Walker, author with Betty Con Walker of Privatisation: Sell Off or Sell Out (Sydney University Press, 2008) pointed out the misleading nature of asserting that rating agencies would downgrade the State because of greater infrastructure expenditure. Standard & Poor’s September 2007 report noted, the Walkers say, that the forecast debt increase resulting from the capital program was unproblematic; the intention to retain the balance sheet in surplus and the intention to sell electricity generating businesses was noted.

Leaving aside whether rating agencies are any more than agents of globalisation and that they have been sometimes unreliably recommending investments in companies like Enron up to the day before they crashed, the notion that the State’s future should be hostage to such agencies is grossly distasteful.

The public debt for Western European countries ranges from 26 per cent up to 64 per cent of GDP (excluding Norway and Italy which are special cases), yet their credit ratings are over 90 out of 100. As already noted Australia’s public debt is 15 per cent of GDP; NSW’s debt is around 1 per cent of GSP.

Advertisement

To assert that the level of debt necessary to fund vitally important infrastructure is unsustainable is nonsense! More than that, it is dangerous.

A few months ago, distinguished New York Times columnist Thomas L. Friedman (“Who will tell the people?International Herald Tribune, May 4, 2008) noted “If all Americans could compare Berlin's luxurious central train station today with the grimy, decrepit Penn Station in New York City, they would swear we were the ones who lost World War II”.

Change a few words and he could be writing about Sydney, indeed the whole of New South Wales. It is time we stopped simply accepting that what ideologically driven politicians tell us is correct. It doesn’t even add up. When it doesn’t make sense and feel right then it is time to demand a different truth.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Des Griffin AM served as Director of the Australian Museum, Sydney from 1976 until 1998 and presently is Gerard Krefft Memorial Fellow, an honorary position at the Australian Museum, Sydney.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Des Griffin

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Des Griffin
Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy