Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Traditional Humanities out: Creative Industries in

By Gary Ianziti - posted Thursday, 10 May 2007


I nevertheless remain unconvinced that Creative Industries can deliver the educational outcomes that are the hallmark of the humanities disciplines.

Creative Industries provides specific training across a range of creative arts fields. It does not offer a generalist degree that would introduce students to the breadth of study one associates with the Bachelor of Arts.

Let me now move on to my third and final point. Suppose we admit for the sake of argument that advertising and marketing are powerful tools. Let us therefore imagine that QUT succeeds in its upcoming campaign to re-badge Creative Industries as an arts faculty.

Advertisement

What sort of university will QUT be without humanities and social sciences? It will be a university of some 40,000 students who will have no opportunity to pursue in-depth study in fields like History, Geography, Politics, and Sociology, to mention only some of the areas now facing the axe.

Consider the fact that QUT’s Education Faculty happens to be one of the nation’s largest centres for teacher training. The staff in the present School of Humanities and Human Services are the sole providers of discipline content to QUT education students.

New national policy directives developed by COAF (the Council for the Australian Federation) have re-positioned History and Geography in particular as key target subjects to be taught in the new school curriculum. Will QUT’s education students do drama and dance in the place of History and Geography? How will that affect their ability to qualify as competent practitioners in their chosen profession?

But why stop with our future teachers? What about our future lawyers, or our future journalists? How will the axing of humanities and social sciences at QUT enhance their educational opportunities?

Students notoriously vote with their feet. Over the 13 years that I have been at QUT, thousands of students have braved the long trek out to Carseldine campus to study history. Many of them have been pleasantly surprised by what they have found: something like a liberal arts college atmosphere, where they are encouraged to hone their skills in the arts of debate and critical enquiry. Sadly, students looking for this kind of educational experience may soon have to look elsewhere.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

46 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Gary Ianziti is (at the moment) still teaching history and historiography at QUT.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 46 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from QUT
 The science of reporting climate change
 Why schools need more than a business plan
 Suburban resilience
 Science unlimited
 Wake-up call for science
 More...
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy