Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Weaning off welfare

By Andrew Murray - posted Wednesday, 28 June 2006


The harmonisation approach essentially tries to ameliorate the existing system by adjusting income tax and income tests to avoid the most serious conjunctions of withdrawal rates.

In terms of fundamental reform Ingles canvassed integration of tax and income tests. Separate means tests for welfare payments would be removed and replaced with special tax scales for those in receipt of payments. However he warns that the differing definitions of income used for income tax and for welfare may be too far apart for integration to be feasible except as a very long-term goal.

The opposite approach is to aim for full separation of the tax and welfare regimes. One model suggested involved adding family tax benefits, Youth Allowance and rent assistance to basic income-support payments in a family and subjecting them to a single withdrawal rate. A tax credit would be provided to ensure that no tax was paid until all income support and additional payments were exhausted under the income test. This would ensure the family was subject to only the taper on the income test for payments until they ceased and then taper on the tax credit plus the underlying tax rate.

Advertisement

All these approaches involve quite radical restructuring of tax and welfare systems, but government action to date has just modified EMTRs to some degree through reduced tapers and tax rates.

Without fairly fundamental recasting of tax and welfare interaction any further adjustments to the existing system may tend to shift the EMTRs to another income or benefit group, and like squeezing a balloon, it won’t get smaller but just bulge out in a different place.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Senator Andrew Murray is Taxation and Workplace Relations Spokesperson for the Australian Democrats and a Senator for Western Australia.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Andrew Murray

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Andrew Murray
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy