Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Is the North Korea-USA summit over before it begins?

By Russell Grenning - posted Thursday, 17 May 2018


In fact, an analysis of new satellite-based remote sensing technology has confirmed that the structure of the mountain under which North Korea had been conducting its nuclear tests had changed and that its shape had been flattened and that it was half a metre shorter. After the September test last year satellite images showed that there had been massive landslides on its slopes and there was speculation that the massive bomb had vaporised an enormous chamber at its base and that this, combined with similar earlier tests, had caused the mountain to “sag”.

If all of this is true – and evidence suggests that it most certainly is – then North Korea is making a virtue (an appearance of being less belligerent) from a necessity. They are past masters with this ploy.

Disarmament experts are worried about the risk of spreading radioactive dust if there are rushed efforts to close down the facility and there is also speculation that this dismantling could be purely cosmetic and allow for a quick resumption of tests in the future.

Advertisement

“If it’s done well, there is no risk of radiation being released. But the question is, are those tunnels being sealed in a way that they couldn’t again be used? The only risk I see is that we will take the destruction of a couple of tunnels as a physical barrier to the resumption of testing in the future,” Jon Wolfsthal of the Nuclear Crisis Group told Reuters.

Kim Jong-un has appeared offended that the dismantling of his testing facility is a result of a catastrophic collapse saying, “Some say that we are terminating facilities that are not functioning, but you will see that we have two more tunnels that are bigger than the existing ones and that they are in good condition.”

Another recent claim which, if true, would question North Korea’s professed dismantling of its nuclear testing facility is a report in a leading South Korean newspaper that the regime has maintained a secret uranium enrichment facility separate from the Punggye-ri site. The newspaper also reported that the USA was aware of the site and would demand that it to be dismantled as a critical part of any deal to denuclearise the country. 

The ever tightening noose imposed by economic sanctions around North Korea’s neck has also helped drive their new attitude.

Back in late February, President Trump announced a new round of harsh sanctions against the regime which were aimed at cutting off North Korea’s imports of oil and exports of coal.  Illicit ship-to-ship transfers of refined oil and coal had allowed North Korea to avoid a fair bit of the pain of sanctions and both China and Russia have been linked to this trade.

This move which is probably the last turn of the screw of the economic vice against North Korea just stops short of an all-out economic embargo. While US Treasury Secretary stopped short of saying the nation’s navy would forcibly board ships on the high seas, he said the USA would petition China and other countries to allow inspections of suspicious ships.

Advertisement

The US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo who has met Kim Jong-un twice in recent times has said the USA will agree to lift sanctions entirely if the North Koreans completely dismantle its nuclear program.

He said that while the USA would not be willing to invest taxpayer dollars in North Korea, the lifting of sanctions would pave the way for private American investment and would create economic prosperity that “will rival” South Korea.

Critically for Chairman Kim, the USA has not said that it is not seeking regime change which should provide him with some comfort at least.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Russell Grenning is a retired political adviser and journalist who began his career at the ABC in 1968 and subsequently worked for the then Brisbane afternoon daily, The Telegraph and later as a columnist for The Courier Mail and The Australian.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Russell Grenning

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy