Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Australia can address economic decline

By Chris Lewis - posted Thursday, 14 April 2016


Nevertheless, The Economist suggests that the Nordic countries will need further reform given that high levels of taxation now encourage entrepreneurs to move abroad, and too many people live off welfare benefits (especially immigrants) that require much greater means-testing.

In February 2016, it was reported that Sweden's wage setting model, which has served to protect industry's competitiveness by effectively putting a cap on wages for the rest of the labour market, was coming under greater pressure. Different unions now proposed separate wage demands during upcoming wage negotiations; major unions were at odds about how to halve the pay gap between women and men by 2028; the government had intervened to award teachers higher pay to improve teachers' status; and business groups argued that refugees should be paid lower wages (even frozen) to get them into work.

The extent of any policy reform is always a matter for national debate, but any reform should be promoted and defended as a policy to aid a dynamic economy rather than hinder it.

Advertisement

Take the taxation of housing in Australia. While state governments enjoy high stamp duty revenue from the recent housing boom, a recent March 2016 McKell Institute report urges an annual property tax on all owned land (not housing) based on a per square metre value with no tax-free threshold. Removing stamp duty would lower up-front costs; remove penalties for those moving house to find work or those who need to repurchase after unforeseen circumstances such as divorce; aid people downsizing in older age; and gain revenue from those who live in an expensive house and pay no tax (A plan to end stamp duty: making property taxation farer in New South Wales).

To conclude, Australia can long remain a great nation with a decent economic/social policy mix. It does retain a number of advantages that will remain attractive to domestic and foreign investment. Nevertheless, in an increasingly global economy, assuming that dangerous levels of protectionist sentiment do not re-emerge, ongoing reform is needed to ensure continued prosperity for Australia's liberal democracy.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Chris Lewis, who completed a First Class Honours degree and PhD (Commonwealth scholarship) at Monash University, has an interest in all economic, social and environmental issues, but believes that the struggle for the ‘right’ policy mix remains an elusive goal in such a complex and competitive world.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Chris Lewis

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy