Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

APEC-Manila and South China Sea Joint Development Areas

By Stewart Taggart - posted Friday, 13 November 2015


At the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) meeting later this month , the elephant in the room will be the South China Sea.

Ambiguities over China's nine-dotted line is hindering development of South China Sea oil and gas supplies. Joint Development Zones connected to multilateral infrastructure could solve this problem.
Source: US EIA, Klaudia & Sandler, 2005, Grenatec

Advertisement

And while it's not on the official agenda, it'll be very hard to sweep under the rug.

For proof of the sensitivity, look no further than China.

With the meeting just weeks away (Nov 18-19), China still hasn't confirmed whether Chinese President Xi Jinping will attend.

Despite assurances the South China Sea won't be discussed officially, it may be hard for China to avoid having the issue come up in bilateral meetings.

That's because 'energy resiliency' IS on APEC's agenda, and this includes things like deepening cross-border energy infrastructure connectivity. China, of course, supports this.

The reason is that international infrastructure projects now offer a crucial outlet for China's world-class industrial state champions like State Grid Corp of China.

Advertisement

Now that China's big internal infrastructure needs are largely met, these huge and politically connected companies face domestically destabilizing mass layoffs without new projects overseas.

In China, overseas infrastructure investment is being called, in various ways, the 'going out' strategy. It provides much of the rationale behind China's 'One Belt, One Road' slogan. The slogan is aimed at encouraging deeper economic integration in Asia through expanded cross-border infrastructure.

This would be largely built by Chinese companies and funded in whole or part through funding from China's newly-created $100 billion Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB).

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

This article was first published on the Grenatec blog.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Stewart Taggart is principal of Grenatec, a non-profit research organizing studying the viability of a Pan-Asian Energy Infrastructure. A former journalist, he is co-founder of the DESERTEC Foundation, which advocates a similar network to bring North African solar energy to Europe.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Stewart Taggart

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy