Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Is society becoming more extreme?

By Mal Fletcher - posted Thursday, 22 January 2015


In a more segmented and diversified age, we are inclined to vote according to issues, particularly the two or three that matter most to us, as individuals and as families.

Of course, in this media-saturated age we also vote for personality.

'Who can best negotiate a bacon sandwich?' may not be the stuff of Shakespearean political drama, but it does – if only subconsciously – colour the zeitgeist when it comes to 'Who can I relate to best?'

Advertisement

On a social level, any movement toward extremes is coloured in part by the impacts of globalisation, urbanisation and the high mobility of modern society. Each represents challenges to social cohesion.

We have more and more people living in smaller spaces who feel that they have less and less in common with each other.

It's harder for us to feel that we actually belong together in our communities, that we're all part of the same essential narrative, or share a common history.

This is exacerbated by the process of digitisation and the fact that so much of our conversation is mediated through gadgets and screens.

Before being accused of Luddism, I need to point out that as a social futurist I am very keen on new technologies, which I study relatively closely.

But technology is not destiny – the future is shaped more by human choice than by tools. We must decide how best to use technology – and we're still having that debate when it comes to such things as social media.

Advertisement

In response to all of this, there's a rise in tribalism, which in its most far-fetched guise is linked to xenophobia and ultra-nationalism.

In most cases, however, tribalism takes a much more benign form, as the expression of a search for others who think like us and share our worldview or heritage.

To break through the hubbub of a noisy age and locate potential friends, people of normally moderate views may experiment with the fringes of opinion a little more openly. They might also express half-formed views in uncharacteristically strong ways – in the cybersphere, for example.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

This article was first published on 2020Plus.net.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

53 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mal Fletcher is a media social futurist and commentator, keynote speaker, author, business leadership consultant and broadcaster currently based in London. He holds joint Australian and British citizenship.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mal Fletcher

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 53 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy