Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Uthman Badar is entitled to be a bigot

By Laurence Maher - posted Wednesday, 16 July 2014


The Sydney Opera House announcement of the cancellation of Mr Badar's session was all spin. Again, to his credit, Dr Longstaff later frankly acknowledged that the sole reason for the cancellation was the level of public outrage that Mr Badar's idea should even be discussed. Unfortunately, FODI has made itself look ridiculous.

Whingeing

Mr Badar rightly complains that FODI has displayed hypocrisy. But he and his supporters are pulling our legs in their portrayal of him as a free speech "victim"/hero.

Advertisement

After being axed from FODI 2014, Mr Badar conducted a media conference during which he declined to say whether or not he believed there were circumstances in which honour killings could be justified. Then, he laid the hyperbole on with a trowel, stating that he:

hadn't even opened my mouth and having not said anything, words were shoved in my mouth, outrage ensued, and of course that is the way Islamophobia works . . .

In truth, his authorship of the title, and prior advertising, of his idea was a crystal clear speech act which Mr Badar has affirmed repeatedly. Its effects, such as they are, continue. No words were "shoved in [his] mouth". He has had plenty to say, including one television interview accessible via his FaceBook page, and the heavens have not fallen. But the arguments favouring his idea remain a closely guarded secret.

Self-censorship or self-help?

It is baffling to this observer why Mr Badar is being so coy. Why not, without further ado, call another media conference to announce that he has published on theHizb ut-Tahrir Australia web site the talk which, when the squeals went up, FODI decided was just too outrageous a challenge to mainstream thought and opinion for it to host in an event with such a pretentious title?

Mr Badar doth protest far too much

Advertisement

The overwhelming majority of Australians have to live with the unpalatable knowledge that Mr Badar was willing to propound his "dangerous" idea. Mr Badar has to live with the unpalatable knowledge that, like the CPA's dictatorship of the proletariat, theocracy is not a goer in Australia: To borrow Lord Denning's words, "Freedom once given cannot be taken away".

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

8 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

L W Maher is a Melbourne barrister with a special interest in defamation and other free speech-related disputes. He has written extensively on Australian Cold War legal history.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Laurence Maher

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Laurence Maher
Article Tools
Comment 8 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy