Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Woodrow Wilson a century on

By Peter Run - posted Friday, 31 January 2014


While Wilson's defence and foreign policy shift moved the United States into superpower status and therefore earned him a degree of greatness, his government was also responsible for a number of regressions on the domestic front. For instance, Wilson the political scientist knew that the question of women's rights to vote would be "settled in the affirmative" no matter what he did but dragged his feet until he married Edith Galt, probably the most powerful first lady in US history.

Secondly, Wilson's government segregated the federal workplace thereby initiating the Jim Crow policies that would last until the Johnson administration. The Wilson cabinet was composed of men from below the Mason-Dixon line with memories of slavery, the civil war and reconstruction. A lot of them had well-known anti-Semitic, anti-Negro and anti-Indian attitudes but, as Berg writes, Wilson felt most at home with this crowd. By instituting segregation, erecting a standing army an entering a war an ocean away, Wilson basically reversed the wishes of the founding fathers, the very reasons for the civil war and therefore reduced the freedoms of American citizens.

Finally, Wilson's decision to stay out of the League of Nations which more or less allowed European imperial ambitions to cause another world war was, as his critics observed at the time, an act of limited courage. His "war to end all wars", it turned out, only ended one world war.

Advertisement

Having reacted relatively in the negative to Berg's "great man" portrayal of Woodrow Wilson, I owe it to the prospective readers that the book is well written. The Wilson Berg presents is thoughtful and empathetic: a moral crusader for inequality in the United States, self-determination and peace around the world. As a student of political science, I do not recognise that Wilson and I choose to disagree with Berg.

There is another Wilson Berg reveals and I like him immensely. He was physically frail throughout his life but he went on to maintain a great deal of interest in sport. He even coached a football (Gridiron) team. He was a caring son, a loving husband and a nurturing father. That Wilson is easy to love.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Peter Run is a PhD student and tutor at The School of Political Science and International Studies, University of Queensland. He holds an MA in Journalism from the University of South Australia and is the Author of Theorising Cultural Conflict, VDM Publishing (2010).

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter Run

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy