Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The sound and silence of the 'C' word: why such hatred for women?

By Jocelynne Scutt - posted Friday, 20 July 2012


'Terry admits that he said the words "f****** black c***" during the Premier League game …

'Cole, 31, who was, he said, just "a car's length away" from Terry when the alleged incident between the two men took place, said he "could make out" Ferdinand saying "Bridgey" and "black" and "c***" in the eight-second episode …

'The prosecutor Duncan Penny replied: "But if he [Terry] had said f****** black c***" [as an insult]?" Cole said: "I don't think racial abuse should be tolerated." …

'Penny said: "Did you not say "And yours, you f****** black c***", as in "I have shagged your missus as well"?'

On that same day, again in the Independent, footballer Ashley Cole's evidence once more had the 'c' word obliterated, apart from its first letter. The practice was followed in The Times, Daily Mail, Daily Express, Telegraph and Evening Standard, as in other print and online media outlets. An exception lay in the reporting of the decision in full, several days later, where 'cunt', along with the other words allegedly used, was spelled out. The Telegraph,Scotsman and Guardian, as with others advising of an 'in full' decision, were constrained not to 'launder' the Chief Magistrate's words.

In trial coverage, at least one CNN story contained the warning: 'Editor's note:This report contains offensive language' yet it, too, declined to record the word in full, whilst reports made apparent, through numerous exchanges, the crucial nature of the word:

Advertisement

'When Cole first had to utter the word c*** he hesitated and instead spelled it out one letter at a time. Riddle instructed him that he should say the word in its entirety. "You don't have to be shy," he said, in an attempt to be reassuring. Smiling, Cole replied, "I'm not shy."'

The lip-readers faced a similar dilemma:

'… then there were also the two lip-reading experts … who were forced to pick their way through the "industrial language" of the two Premier League footballers for the benefit of the court. The first … Susan Whitewood, instinctively said "Excuse me" before she first uttered the phrase "black c****".'

Meanwhile:

'Ferdinand told … Chief Magistrate Howard Riddle that the four-letter abuse … began to fly freely. He said: "He called me, excuse my language, a ****. I called him a **** back and he gave me a gesture as if to say my breath smelled.'

So what is it about 'cunt' that propels it into the ionosphere in the media and now, as it appears, when referred to by the biological term, to be worthy of banning from legislative debate?

Advertisement

On 14 June 2012, Michigan news media reported upon the expulsion, from the Michigan legislature, of Rep. Lisa Brown. Her offence? Using the word vagina.

In a House debate on a Bill seeking to further regulate abortion providers and outlaw all terminations after 20 weeks, Rep. Brown referred to her Jewish faith, saying:

'Wherever there's a question of the life of the mother, or that of the unborn child, Jewish law rules in favour of preserving the life of the mother. The status of the fetus as human life does not equal that of the mother. I have not asked you to adapt and adhere to my religious beliefs. Why are you asking me to adapt to yours.'

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

46 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Jocelynne A. Scutt is a Barrister and Human Rights Lawyer in Mellbourne and Sydney. Her web site is here. She is also chair of Women Worldwide Advancing Freedom and Dignity.

She is also Visiting Fellow, Lucy Cavendish College, University of Cambridge.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jocelynne Scutt

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 46 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy