Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Saving and the aging population

By Yvonne Zardani - posted Saturday, 15 December 2001


Labor has claimed that the Howard Government already has legislation on the backburner to cut pensions through harsh means testing arrangements that will impact on pensioners who give family financial assistance, and those who receive compensation payments for pain and suffering.

Prime Minister Howard has also reportedly raised the spectre of increasing the retirement age for the age pension.

He told the Press Club last August 'I think we do have to face the need as a community ... for people to remain in the workforce longer.' (Press Club Address, 1 August 2001).

Advertisement

This suggests he is contemplating a new lift in the age pension age.

By deferring people's retirements indefinitely he can justify taking the knife to pensions.

"I do believe very strongly that this is a neglected area of change," he added at the time.

Labor said during the election campaign that the Howard Government has been responsible for well over $5 billion in cuts to social welfare since 1996.

Given the Government's pork barrelling during the election campaign and the resultant drastic depletion of the budget surplus, there seems little likelihood of any policy initiatives to assist the elderly or to address the issue of the savings regime in Australia in a meaningful way.

With the so-called mutual obligation farce about to be extended to the unemployed up to 49 years of age (commencing next year), burgeoning unemployment amongst the young and the old, and the not-far-off introduction of 'mutual obligation' for those unemployed over 50 (due in 2003), there is also little prospect of there being anyone left earning sufficient wages to be able to save at all.

Advertisement

One has to wonder what our forefathers fought for in the last century.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Yvonne Zardani OAM is Queensland State Secretary of the Australian Pensioners and Superannuants' League.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Yvonne Zardani
Related Links
Australian Pensioners and Superannuants' League
Centrelink
Photo of Yvonne Zardani
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy