Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The rise of the Greens: politics and the supernatural

By David Castles - posted Thursday, 14 July 2011


They have a stance on a number of moral/ethical issues that offend certain religious groups and have the support of others. Nowhere do they deny the existence of a god or promote any sort of alternative theology.

Many of The Greens supporters and members count themselves as standard mainstream religious believers. In an article defending the Greens as being "anti-religious," ACT Greens candidate Lin Hatfield Dodds, a Christian and former national director of Uniting Care wrote:

"There are a significant number of Australians whose values and faith mean that they will support the Greens. There are a significant number of Australians whose values and faith mean that they will support either the ALP or the Coalition. God is beyond human limitations; we should not, and cannot, seek to reduce the movement of God to our own framework of political or moral values."

Advertisement

These are obviously not the beliefs of an animist or even (shock horror) an atheist Communist. These are the musings of a Post Modernist Christian who is wholeheartedly a fan of the supernatural realm of an all-powerful unseen god, presumably the same entity that George Pell and Kevin Andrews worship each Sunday.

Why then does a political party, which does not have overtly anti-religious policies and include among their numbers good Bible believing Christians, receive the bile directed at them by the likes of Kevin Andrews and George Pell? What is it that so offends these defenders of the faith and their fellow travellers?

Unlike atheists who, according to the faithful, wander alone, unloved and unnoticed in an amoral wasteland of non-belief, the Green movement has managed the unimaginable, the unthinkable.

The Greens have presented what appears to be an alternative to religious superstition that is palatable, logical, clear, positive, focused and most frightening of all, appeals to the spiritual without using a contrived theology based on death, guilt and fear.

A spiritual belief system without postulating an all-powerful god of morals is a frightening concept to the rigid Theo-political mind. Andrews and Pell can hardly be blamed for comparing the Green movement to Communism given their 1950s political worldview and late Iron Age religious beliefs.

However, they can rest easy for now, but not forever. No political party in Australia would dare to be overtly anti-religious fearing the loss of votes that, as a left-leaning party, they probably didn't have anyway.

Advertisement

Religious leaders will continue to claim to speak for a huge non-existent flock and will continue to run their supernatural charities, investments, enormous property portfolios, lobby groups and enjoy their organization's tax free status while moralizing and pontificating to the very tax payers that are forced to keep them in business.

Do the "Forces of Righteousness" really have anything to fear from the Greens? Is their anxiety unfounded? The answer probably depends on how future events unfold.

The Greens could stay focused and united and continue on their upward path. Alternatively, they could lose their way and like the Democrats, sink into oblivion. At present it would be fair to say that Pell and Andrews should have a nice cup of tea and relax with a Good Book.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

Article edited by Kali Goldstone.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

53 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Castles has retired from university life in science and engineering to pursue a long held interest in theology, history and social issues. David’s diverse career ranges from soldier, rock musician to TAFE teacher, electronics engineer and computer programmer and is happy to admit that he has never been enrolled at any university, anywhere.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Castles

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of David Castles
Article Tools
Comment 53 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy