Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Are fears about inadequate debate about key Australian political issues warranted?

By Chris Lewis - posted Tuesday, 7 June 2011


In terms of industry and trade, Australian policy-makers are sadly mistaken to believe that all will be well if only all nations adhere to comparative advantage just because we have an abundance of minerals in the ground. Quite clearly, most Western societies will face tougher times ahead because of the cost of their welfare system and higher wages. Hence, just as other Western nations alter their policy positions to meet their industry needs, so more Australians are likely to debate our growing reliance on mining while manufacturing continues to wane and agriculture faces greater pressure. While a November 2010 Roy Morgan poll indicated that 90 per cent of Australians are “more likely to buy products labeled made in Australia”, it remains to be seen whether Australian consumers can resist cheaper Asian products.

As far as addressing the environment, the importance of the economic imperative may long win the day, unless an environmental catastrophe becomed evident to all. This is despite an April 2011 Roy Morgan poll noting that both environmental and economic issues rated nearly equally as the most important international and domestic issues.The difficulty to balance economic and environmental considerations is also indicated by a  March 2011 Roy Morgan poll indicating 61 per cent of opposition to Australian nuclear power plants, yet 59 per cent support for the export of uranium for peaceful purposes.

Tougher attitudes toward asylum-seekers are also likely to remain, especially if Australia faces greater budgetary limitations in the future. While Australia should take its fair share of refugees, a reasonable obligation as we remain a relatively prosperous nation, most Australians will only support a limited number.

Advertisement

The same can be expected of public attitudes towards immigration. While the overwhelming majority of Australians rightfully have very tolerant views about race, as do most Australian politicians, it will be public sentiment that dictates any greater effort to encourage cultural integration and the extent of immigration.

Again, while the Left will accuse the Coalition of exploiting issues, it is often the public that leads the debate as indicated by growing pressure for Labor to reverse previously relaxed foreign investment rules that saw a major increase of overseas buyers into the Australian housing market.

But individual policies must also be linked if we are to deal with major issues, as evident by increasing housing unaffordability which has recently seen home ownership levels for Australians under 35 decline from 44 to 38 per cent between 2001 and 2008, and the proportion of Australians aged 55 to 64 with mortgages increasing from 13 to 30 per cent between 1996-97 and 2007-08.

Again, Labor has no monopoly on discussion of complex issues, although solutions still are largely absent. As the Coalition’s Kevin Andrews indicated in May 2010, Australia’s housing problems are being caused by a number of factors including “shortages of land, a growing number of heads of households, the ageing population”, and higher immigration. Hence, the Coalition indicated that an annual independent review would determine Australia’s infrastructure needs for short, medium and long-term projected population numbers to decide whether future infrastructure bottlenecks were being addressed, or whether limits of immigration numbers were needed.

There are many issues ahead that will attract extensive coverage by a variety of old and new media sources, and involvement by both major parties (and minor parties and independents). Hence, it is simplistic to suggest that the Australian media is dumbing down debate, or that the Coalition is merely obstructionist. The adversarial nature of Australian politics, representative of some social division (although tempered by bipartisanship on many other issues), will ensure that policies are debated and outcomes are acceptable to the majority of Australians, at least most of the time.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Chris Lewis, who completed a First Class Honours degree and PhD (Commonwealth scholarship) at Monash University, has an interest in all economic, social and environmental issues, but believes that the struggle for the ‘right’ policy mix remains an elusive goal in such a complex and competitive world.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Chris Lewis

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy