Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Wilderness is not protected

By Keith Muir - posted Monday, 1 March 2010


Australia is globally significant for its large intact natural landscapes, yet due to political indifference even the wilderness in our national parks and reserves remain at risk.

Only two weeks ago there was the NSW Planning Assessment Commission held a public hearing at Appin south of Sydney into the largest underground coal mining yet proposed in Australia. If approved two longwall mines could then operate in an area that covers from Picton north to the Holsworthy Military Area, east to the Woronora and Metropolitan Catchment Areas and into the Dharawal State Conservation Area.

Forty-seven rivers and streams, 226 pristine swamps, 661 cliff lines and 623 Aboriginal heritage sites are put at risk by this proposal.

Advertisement

Yet BHP Billiton and all government departments did not make any presentations at the Commission’s public hearings. The local communities of south-west Sydney, and pristine public reserves and drinking water catchments impacted by this proposal at least deserve a public presentation of issues and concerns.

Of course, the experts conduct discussions with the Commissioners behind closed doors who will, no doubt, approve this project, because the NSW Government is out of money, not water, and this project offers 30 years of mining royalties.

So who cares about the capacity of pristine drinking water catchments and reserves to collect and transmit water? The integrity of pristine nature was not even considered in the 20,000-page environmental assessment. In response to the sensitivity of the area proposed for mining, this mining proposal is 25 per cent more intense than all previous operations, as its longwall panels are much wider.

So when you ask whether we can afford wilderness or to protect reserves, you better add in democratic processes in there as well, for the stakes are going up. And when Sydney has its essential water supplies polluted and diminished by coal mining, then prosperity will have its answer, which will be that it needs these areas, only their reply will be too late in coming. And therein lies the rub.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

29 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mr Keith Muir is executive director of the Colong Foundation for Wilderness. He played a crucial role in securing World Heritage listing for the Blue Mountains and developed a series of NSW based campaigns to expand the wilderness estate from les than half a million to two million hectares. He was awarded an O.A.M for his services to conservation in 2004.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 29 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy