Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Making tax fair and equitable

By Rosanna Scutella - posted Wednesday, 2 December 2009


However, people on low incomes are reluctant to lock away their voluntary savings into accounts that they can’t access for long periods of time, as they tend to have more short-term needs such as their children’s education expenses, the purchase of major household durables etc.

Thus in addition to the above reforms to superannuation support for saving for short term needs can be achieved by a government funded Matched Savings Account to allow people to save for more immediate needs. The government would then encourage and assist people to save by paying a direct tax free co-contribution into their account, up to a cap, once people have reached their savings goal. Current initiatives such as the First Home Saver Account and the Education Tax Refund would then be rolled into this more coherent and flexible system.

There are already small-scale schemes around that show how this can be done. Saver Plus, a matched savings scheme for families on low incomes developed by the Brotherhood of St Laurence in partnership with ANZ, shows that well structured and targeted savings programs can help people on low incomes build assets for their future wellbeing.

Advertisement

Not only are these measures fair, but they also have the potential to increase aggregate savings, because people on lower and middle incomes are more likely to respond to incentives to save, whereas those on higher incomes are more likely to substitute from other forms of savings and investment into tax preferred options rather than increase their overall savings and investment levels.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

First published in Impact, an ACOSS publication, in the Winter 2009 edition.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

13 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Rosanna Scutella is the Ronald Henderson Senior Research Fellow at the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, and the Brotherhood of St Laurence.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 13 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy