Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

How would you like it? E-mail use is becoming a problem for teachers

By Sandra White - posted Wednesday, 29 January 2003


It is absolutely easy for recipients to misinterpret the tone of an e-mail that lacks the visual and aural cues of speech and the formalities of a letter. Consider the earlier scenario of the report card and school attendance. A response such as "will look into this as soon as I get time" can be read in several different ways by the parent, dependent on their state of mind or composure.

The potential risk of complaint by parents and students is high, and perhaps dangerously high in relation to 'stressed-out' Year 12 students whom teachers report are the greatest (and most demanding) users of teacher-student e-mail communication at this time.

Already, teachers report receiving e-mails from Year 12 students at all times of the day and night, including weekends and holidays. They expect to be answered … now! What will happen when the teacher is out, away, or just plain tired and fails to respond? What if the student feels their major assessment mark has suffered due to the lack of response by the teacher? Accusations of professional negligence?

Advertisement

These are the areas of threat to job security, especially in independent schools where some students/ parents have unrealistic expectations and/or undue influence.

The possibility of making errors with expression, tone and/or content compounds with the pressure for speedy, perhaps hasty, response. The expectation for quick response does not apply to other forms of communication between teachers and parents and students, it is part of the e-world mantra. Schools must question the e-mail expectation or run the risk of increasing complaint and decreasing staff morale.

And all of this raises the question of what type of student is being created? A student who takes responsibility for study and problem solving? Who develops independence in learning? Or one who becomes dependent, complacent and lazy because they can always get another assignment sheet, or answer, or direction, with just a few clicks of the finger?

It is time to think, discuss, and then to take action to achieve sensible and reasonable protocols in schools that allow the benefits of e-mail communication to be retained, but that avoid the risks teachers foresee if authorities refuse to listen.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Sandra White is an organiser for the Independent Education Union of Australia.

Related Links
Catholic Education Commission Directory of Schools
Independent Education Union of Australia
'Schools on the net' StudentNet
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy