Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Planet Earth - babies need not apply

By Malcolm King - posted Monday, 27 April 2009


The zero population growth greenies and Ms Kanck have support in strange places. What are we to make of Barry Walters, an associate professor of obstetric medicine at the University of Western Australia, who was quoted recently in a national newspaper?

“Every newborn baby in Australia represents a potent source of greenhouse gas emissions for an average of 80 years not simply by breathing, but by the prolifigate consumption of resources typical of our society. What then should we do as medical practitioners?” Dr Walters asked.

He goes on to say, “Far from showering financial booty on new mothers and thereby rewarding greenhouse-unfriendly behaviour, a Baby Levy (his capitals) in the form of a carbon tax should apply, in line with the polluter pays principle.”

Advertisement

And just when you thought it couldn’t get weirder, American environmentalist Kelpie Wilson argues that abortion should be considered an environmental issue. She wants women to consider the environmental cost of bringing a child in to the world. I like to think Kelpie means that women should consider this before conception - but maybe not.

Ms Kanck seems to have a knack of adopting “whacko” causes. A few years ago she advocated the regulation and decriminalisation of Ecstasy in South Australia. But her source credibility is not the issue here yet.

Here’s another problem. The Greens were right to crow about the Democrats and the GST. It was indefensible. Population is the Greens GST. It will split the party, with those advocating direct action on outputs (anti-corporatist “shonks”, polluters, environmental protectionists) and those who advocate cutting back on “supply” - people.

It’s a curious phenomenon that when the going gets tough, a select few scramble to the moral high ground, tell us the end of the world is nigh and start bossing us around - in this case, calling for zero population growth. They are the Red Guards of our conscience.

Sandra Kanck, the Sustainable Population lobby and other misanthropes have tapped in to a rich vein of doom and gloom to use in their global scare campaign. Who would have thought that they would want to legislate what we do in our bedrooms?

It’s curious that the most striking manifestation of the loathing they have for every human can be seen in the idea that we need a significant reduction in the number of human beings from people who purport to love nature.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

143 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Malcolm King is a journalist and professional writer. He was an associate director at DEEWR Labour Market Strategy in Canberra and the senior communications strategist at Carnegie Mellon University in Adelaide. He runs a writing business called Republic.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Malcolm King

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 143 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy