Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Piracy: a symptom of Somalia's deeper problems

By Brett Schaefer - posted Thursday, 23 April 2009


Indeed, the US should in the long term be pushing for such an outcome - not least as a means for moderating political resistance by the AU, which has a historical antipathy to recognising independence of regions within existing African states. As such, stature within whatever national authority develops in Somalia must be made explicit. Successfully applying this strategy will take time and will no doubt face many difficulties. However, such an approach is more likely to lead to success than the current strategy of imposing a central authority that lacks legitimacy.

Increase international co-operation to dissuade Somali pirates.

The above strategy of bolstering and spreading responsible governance in Somalia should help reduce piracy simply by decreasing the lawlessness that permits pirates to act with impunity. However, to speed this outcome, assistance and recognition need to be explicitly tied to co-operation in anti-piracy efforts.

Advertisement

The US and other nations should also apply pressure to Puntland and other Somali authorities linked to piracy by undermining the profit motive (e.g., applying US Treasury sanctions on financial institutions linked to piracy or prohibiting insurance claims on ransoms paid to pirates). The US should also, in co-ordination with other nations active in clamping down on piracy, consider implementing a naval interdiction and inspection of ships from Somalia and other ports known to be harbouring pirates - should these ports prove unwilling to co-operate with anti-piracy efforts - to be lifted when they co-operate with anti-piracy efforts. Leadership for these measures could come from a variety of countries, not just the US, whose naval capacities are robust enough to achieve these goals and whose interests are affected by piracy.

The UN Security Council could assist by blessing more aggressive interdiction of ports in Somali and other nations where pirates have demonstrably been able to seek refuge, recognising local authorities as part of the process toward establishing a legitimate national government in Somalia, supporting a benchmark process for access to foreign assistance, and eschewing a UN peacekeeping force as a means for artificially bolstering the TFG.

Beyond piracy

The US benefits from having sea lanes free of pirates and should pursue an assertive strategy for discouraging such activity. The uniquely lawless situation in Somalia requires supplementary strategies to the anti-piracy strategy. Specifically, the US must focus international attention on the need to recognise and bolster points of stability in Somalia and identify and work with local authorities toward the long-term goal of expanding governance in the Somalia.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

First published by The Heritage Foundation on April 17, 2009.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

4 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Brett D. Schaefer is Jay Kingham Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs in the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, a division of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies, at The Heritage Foundation.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Brett Schaefer
Article Tools
Comment 4 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy