Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Shareholders no better than greedy execs

By Mirko Bagaric - posted Thursday, 26 March 2009


So where does that leave corporate salaries? By any measure they are large. The top 10 ten CEOs in Australia in 2007 averaged more than $15 million annually. On a functionality basis almost certainly none of them deserved it. Those types of figures might be justifiable to people with rare, nearly unique skills and insights whose management profoundly catapults a company.

But life is not like that. You see, there are in fact no true geniuses. Even those that at the right end of the bell curve of human capacity normally fail to implement their talents in a manner that is commensurate with their acumen. In truth there is nothing that a $15 million executive can do that the next bloke or lady couldn’t do just as well for $200,000.

Still in judging the ethics of executive salary, you need to look at the whole matrix and in this context the white elephant is the public company structure. The executives aren’t taking from the poor; they are taking from the shareholders.

Advertisement

This raises for consideration the degree of concern that shareholders are entitled to. This is where it gets a bit sticky. There is one sole reason that individuals turn into shareholders and buy small parts of big corporations: to make money. Moreover, they don’t want to do anything to make their money. It is a purely passive investment. By and large shareholders don’t care how the corporation makes money, so long as it is successful in this pursuit. Shareholders only get angry when corporations start losing money and hence the sudden revolt against executive pay.

Shareholders and corporate executives are cut from the same cloth. They share a fundamental desire to make money for the sake of it. They differ not in nature, but simply in the extent to which their activities can enrich them. Hence, the current fury towards executives is hypocrisy at its capitalist finest. Never in the history of the free market have shareholders complained because their shares increased too much.

In the end, the fury about corporate salaries is simply an expression of unfulfilled greed - this time not by directors, but by shareholders.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Age on March 20, 2009.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

7 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mirko Bagaric, BA LLB(Hons) LLM PhD (Monash), is a Croatian born Australian based author and lawyer who writes on law and moral and political philosophy. He is dean of law at Swinburne University and author of Australian Human Rights Law.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mirko Bagaric

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Mirko Bagaric
Article Tools
Comment 7 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy