Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Bligh's 'Green Army'

By Jessica Brown - posted Tuesday, 17 March 2009


Studies show that while some types of government help - such as job search assistance - are effective in getting unemployed people into permanent and sustainable work, direct job creation is not one of them. According to the OECD, these programs have had “little success in helping unemployed people get jobs in the open labour market”.

Work for the Dole and other programs which keep unemployed people in the habit of work and help them brush up their skills can be successful but these are undertaken in addition to, not instead of, looking for a permanent job.

There’s no doubt that the most pressing problem for all Australian governments - including Queensland’s - is rising unemployment. Anna Bligh is right to make it her priority. However, the Green Army will have a limited effect at best. At worst, it will actually displace other jobs that would have been created. The best thing any government can do to lower unemployment is to facilitate a competitive jobs market, by focusing on lowering any barriers - such as taxes or red tape - that stop businesses from hiring new workers.

Advertisement

The risk in the Green Army project is that in trying to achieve two objectives, neither will be met. Some workers will be “painting rocks” when they could be spending their time looking for a better paid and permanent job, while poor conservation projects may get the go-ahead ahead of more deserving ones.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jessica Brown is a Policy Analyst at the Centre for Independent Studies.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jessica Brown

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy