Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Kevin Rudd's spin on capitalism is almost pure myth

By Leon Bertrand - posted Monday, 2 February 2009


But even more disturbing than this exercise in propaganda is the political agenda that Rudd intends to use it to advance. As Paul Kelly observes, “Rudd dates the neo-liberal ascendancy from 1978-2008 and speculates with breathtaking hubris that the post-2008 epoch might be called "social capitalism" or "social democratic capitalism". He says it will be defined by an activist state and open markets”.

In other words, Rudd intends to use this essay to justify his unconstructive policies which involve excessive government intervention. Examples include FuelWatch and GROCERYchoice, which anyone who understands how markets work knows would be ineffective in reducing prices. Similarly, there’s the doling of billions of dollars to car makers and “Ruddbank”: initiatives which are sold as being about protecting jobs, when even more jobs could be saved if the economy is stimulated by means of reductions of personal income tax rates.

Other policies which involve excessive intervention include the bank deposit guarantee, which disastrously resulted in a flight from non-bank institutions, and the Gillard industrial relations regime, which will compound job losses during this current economic downturn.

Advertisement

It was interesting to see Malcolm Turnbull compare Rudd with Gough Whitlam, as there are a number of parallels. A global recession welcomed the Whitlam government soon after its election, and the Whitlam government reacted with over-spending, and a re-regulatory overhaul of industrial relations. While the Whitlam government slashed tariffs at a time when levels were very high, Kevin Rudd has introduced extra protectionism for the auto industry by means of his distorting subsidies in a period of lower protection.

Sadly, the Rudd Government appears to be repeating many of the mistakes of the Whitlam years, where the economy’s recovery was hampered by government intervention. If Rudd keeps pursuing policies which appeal to Labor’s left-wing faction, he may well turn out to be as unpopular as and infamous as Whitlam himself.

Rudd’s plan to bring Australia back to levels of spending, regulation and protectionism similar to the 1970s is a betrayal of the Hawke and Keating legacy, as well as Rudd’s pre-election claim that he was an economic conservative.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

32 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Leon Bertrand is a Brisbane blogger and lawyer.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Leon Bertrand

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 32 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy