Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Iraq: 'dramatically freer, dramatically safer and dramatically better'

By Bashdar Ismaeel - posted Wednesday, 31 December 2008


Simply put, the US saw their Iraqi dream shatter to pieces, yet seemingly had no alternative plans to the expectation that they would be met with open arms by most of the Iraqi public. It took the US almost four years with the onset of the successful surge strategy, to stop fire-fighting.

Reconstruction efforts have been greatly hampered with unemployment rates high, and a lack of civil infrastructure and medical facilities still common place. However, the job of reconstruction in Iraq, particularly in the aftermath of the chaos, was like rebuilding a house in the middle of a tornado.

The damning verdict on reconstruction was emphasised by a leaked government report in the US, which detailed the failure to apply reconstruction funds into real physical achievements, as it struggled to rebuild what had been devastated by the war.

Advertisement

Harvesting the seeds sown before

For all the popular opinion among some Iraqi and Western commentators, every misfortune or problem currently experienced by Iraq is not purely down to the US.

The key problems engulfing Iraq emanate from its artificial creation in the aftermath of World War I. At that time Iraq was composed of three disparate former Ottoman provinces that were essentially stitched together by Britain and her allies, and then “glued” by dictatorships.

It is true that the US unceremoniously opened a can of worms, however, Iraq would have come to a boil, sooner or later, regardless of US intervention. Americans knew that challenges lay ahead for the new Iraq, but they simply did not appreciate the extent and that it would cost them billions of dollars, see them commit thousands of soldiers and shatter their foreign policy image.

Iraqi politicians have squabbled intensively and failed to pass key legislation, national reconciliation continues to prove elusive; and sectarian violence, despite drastic security improvements, remains a real threat. Surely, all these factors attributable to Iraqis can not all be attributed on the US?

Signing the security pact

Bush’s fourth visit to Iraq was designed to underline strong ties between the US and Iraq, and was to be symbolised by the signing of the SOFA agreement.

On previous visits, Bush’s visits were short and surrounded by tight security, owing much to the volatile atmosphere on the ground. This visit was undertaken with relatively less security, as Bush met with key Iraqi leaders and US commanders inside the fortified green zone.

Advertisement

By Bush’s own admission, the Iraqi project had been "longer and more costly than expected", but despite openly expressing his regret at failed intelligence prior to the invasion, he firmly believed his decision to invade was justified.

With only weeks remaining before President-elect Barack Obama takes charge, many have accused of Bush of tying the hands of the next administration with his policies in Iraq. Obama, inheriting many issues in Iraq and across the Middle East, is now expected to oversee what is hoped to be the final chapter of the US adventure in Iraq - the departure of the estimated 150,000 US forces within the next few years.

Iraqi politicians were quick to praise Bush’s role, with Iraqi President Jalal Talabani, hailing the US for an Iraq that was now “dramatically freer, dramatically safer and dramatically better”.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

First published in the Kurdish Globe on December 18, 2008.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Bashdar Pusho Ismaeel is a London-based freelance writer and analyst, whose primary focus and expertise is on the Kurds, Iraq and Middle Eastern current affairs. The main focus of his writing is to promote peace, justice and increase awareness of the diversity, suffering and at times explosive mix in Iraq and the Middle East.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Bashdar Ismaeel

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Bashdar Ismaeel
Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy