Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Framing language, changing meaning

By Chris James - posted Wednesday, 24 December 2008


In The Age “Good Weekend” supplement (November 15) just inside the cover there was a two-page colour advertisement with a picture of a beautifully carved wooden bowl and a caption that stated:

“It’s not just A BOWL. It’s a helping hand in CLIMATE CHANGE”.

The advertisement in “Good Weekend” is a promotion for the logging industry and was the brainchild of a front organisation calling themselves “Wood: Naturally Better”. The advertising promotion alludes to the notion that logging the state forests is environmentally friendly because trees contain valuable carbon that offsets damaging human activities. The promotion reads as follows:

Advertisement

Using wood is naturally better for our environment because it helps with climate change in two very important ways. First, growing trees absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store carbon so efficiently that about half the dry weight of a tree is carbon … Second, forestry is one of the most greenhouse-friendly sectors of the Australian economy … What’s more wood is a truly renewable resource because millions of new trees are planted each year and Australia has a well-established framework to support the conservation and sustainable management of our forests.

It sounds very impressive but in reality 80 per cent of the timber cut from state forests goes to woodchip and pulp. The perception that the logging industry is clean and green and offsets climate change is very misleading but it goes unchallenged because of the way the information is framed. Added to the narrative in this advertisement is an aesthetically pleasing illustration (a wooden bowl) that works to delight our senses: the advertisement works to achieve its aims because we revel in its possibilities and/or assumptions not its realities.

Language and change

The way we use language is always changing. What is unique about the current changes in language is that these changes do not flow naturally from social and cultural shifts as one might expect. Rather, they are influenced by the cognitive sciences and a system of econometrics that serves the interests of market forces.

All language has its own economy, which means it is spread across social space to increase its momentum. Here, it will take on speculative meaning and attach a lot of other options to its legitimacy. We do not simply use language to express ourselves, language is a social device that structures our thinking and programs our lives and opinions.

Words have a semantic network that allows language to be framed in ways that serve to invoke key meanings and predictable outcomes.

A barrister uses language to win a case in the Law Courts. A police officer uses language to extract a confession. A builder uses language to explain his building task.

Advertisement

The timber industry carefully selects its language, re-framing the term “sustainability”, to sell products from a non-sustainable industry.

The way we “frame” language can significantly change its meaning. There are no absolute truths in this re-framing regime and this makes language a useful tool of persuasion especially when you remove the detail and replace it with a conceptual view (or language frames). To this end, language can be a countervailing mechanism that often hides more than it reveals.

These mechanisms are so discursive they frequently fail to come under any serious public scrutiny even though there are some obvious examples in daily life: in advertising, the media, political rhetoric and corporate hype. In this formula there are technically no truths and no lies because everything in the mental processes is subject to the creation of a perception, an ongoing fantasy - an experiment or idea - an entrepreneurial dream.

Language and capital

Language is capital and, like other forms of capital, language capital uses exchange and values to negotiate its continued existence. Language capital occupies a particular social space with each individual characterised by the amount of capital they possess and are able to negotiate.

Like all other forms of capital, language capital is put back into circulation to form the other seeds of capital that are often nothing like the original idea or reality. In this way language gets transmuted and its meaning, over time, expands and contracts and becomes hidden in a system of symbols and signifiers, which can actually eliminate the need for ordinary language that conveys a clear and precise meaning. While this is a natural process linked to human development it can also be manipulated by science and especially by business.

In this respect language can be used to suggest a unifying force that serves to obliterate any social, political, cultural or ethical contest. This happens when we replace language detail with language frames or outlines: in other words, when we adopt a conceptual view of the world. We cannot abstract language itself but we can reduce it to an abstract frame.

Language frames can shroud any incompatibility between words and serve to alter the course of actions and deliberations. Language does not just consist of words it consists of signs. These signs produce many meanings not one meaning per sign. Signs have a referential function, which can invoke a broad category of contents. A sign provides a specific mental impression but it also provides a more abstract concept; a range of possibilities that can be attached to the sign.

It is in this way that language usage has changed from a history of ideas - supposedly leading to human progress - to a process of mediation, mediocrity and countless levels of linguistic obscurantism that leaves many people feeling perplexed.

The sign, whether word or symbol, is dependant on a simple set of instructions for its outcome. Various codes symbols, messages and signifiers can be organised into a paradigm and/or syntagm (outcome) whereby any group of elements, language, methodologies and/or meanings can be interchanged or ordered into a system of rules that can be prioritised. A good example is in a recipe where various ingredients are brought together to make a particular culinary dish. Hence, certain terms can be used to manipulate information and meaning rather than to inform. This kind of language use in marketing is very successful for swaying public opinion.

Cognitive linguistics and framing

In his book Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think (1996) George Lakoff details what he believes to be the “framing” strategies the liberals have used to direct the terms of the US national debate. The liberals, claims Lakoff, “framed virtually every issue from their perspective”.

The example Lakoff gives is that of the Governor of California Arnold Schwarzenegger’s acceptance speech where he said: “When the people win, politics as usual loses”. In Lakoff’s view, Schwarzenegger knows he is going to face the Democrat Legislature so what he has done is to frame himself and also Republican politicians as the people, while framing Democratic politicians as “politics as usual” in advance. Hence, the Democrats are already framed as the enemy of the people before the debate begins.

As Lakoff tells us, the liberals have put a lot of money into creating the language for a particular worldview and the progressives have not responded. Lakoff believes the progressives simply do not understand how to respond. By the time the 2008 primaries came around the Democrats had learned to be a little smarter, we had Democrats Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama talking about the Republican “politics as usual”. They had learned the art of framing.

Cognitive linguistics forms a universal language paradigm, which offers categories, types, frames schemata instead of individual linear ideas, sentences, claims, descriptors etc. Cognitive linguistics is being used by governments and corporations everywhere to persuade the public to adopt policies and products, which would simply not be acceptable if they were clearly stated and fully comprehended. Using metaphors and frames in language demarcates a whole field while telling us how to regard it.

Cognitive language framing makes it almost impossible to break through the hyperbolic veneer because it operates on the emotional responses; it makes people feel rather than think.

Cognitive signals are more powerful than rational discourse because they allow issues, movements, individuals, categories and practices to be sorted into relevant frames with a variety of different meanings. However, when people lose the detail and understanding they tend to invent their own meaning, they replace reality with their own dreams and fantasies and they can become obsessive and/or mentally ill. Cognitive Behavioural Therapy [CBT] uses mindfulness techniques in an attempt to reverse this situation.

Language framing has become an effective market strategy to shape public opinion. Language framing applies mechanistic assumptions to match people and nature to the marketplace but it has a downside in that it is very easy to lose sight of the original objectives and slip into the uncontrollable fantasy. When is a bowl not a bowl?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

29 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Chris James is an artist, writer, researcher and psychotherapist. She lives on a property in regional Victoria and lectures on psychotherapeutic communities and eco-development. Her web site is www.transpersonaljourneys.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Chris James

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Chris James
Article Tools
Comment 29 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy