Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Whistleblowers and their role in civil society and need federal protection

By Andrew Murray - posted Thursday, 23 October 2003


Over the past decade the Australian Democrats have campaigned for strong whistleblower protection laws in both the private and public sectors. We have introduced whistleblower protection legislation for debate in the Federal Parliament but the government remains massively indifferent.

Perhaps the Cole Royal Commission provides an opportunity to push the whistleblowers case.

An effective whistleblower protection scheme serves the public interest by exposing and eliminating fraud, impropriety and waste. This is especially topical in the private sector, given the giant corporate collapses of WorldCom, Enron and HIH, and in the public sector with alleged government involvement in the sexing up of intelligence reports to encourage war in Iraq.

Advertisement

The Cole Royal Commission Report sets out 212 recommendations addressing serious problems in the Building and Construction Industry. The report draws attention to unacceptable industrial practices that challenge the rule of law, undermine the intent of the Workplace Relations Act and adversely affect productivity, efficiency and competition.

If you are fighting criminality or corruption in the workplace you need to encourage disclosure in the public interest. Public-sector disclosure laws are quite effective in the States and Territories but are effectively absent in the Federal arena. And private-sector disclosure laws are effectively non-existent. Witness protection schemes are a poor substitute for disclosure laws.

Lawlessness, corruption and thuggery cannot properly be addressed without whistleblower protection mechanisms in place. Impropriety will only be uncovered if the people in a position to reveal it are genuinely protected, and compensated where appropriate.

There have been useful private-sector initiatives aimed at self-regulation. The commercial world has come to realise that encouraging whistleblowing reduces impropriety and increases productivity.

In the past few years, major audit and accounting groups such as Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Ernst & Young, Pricewaterhouse Coopers and KPMG have established procedures that allow employees to blow the whistle anonymously to auditors on corporate fraud, corruption or theft.

The Australian Stock Exchange's Corporate Governance Council recommends that listed companies provide mechanisms for employees to alert management and the board to misconduct without fear of retribution.

Advertisement

Whistleblowers show great courage in exposing the corrupt and the improper. It is a sad fact that the law still offers them little real protection. Victimisation, exclusion, harassment and derision are all too common experiences for whistleblowers.

Law is needed to establish and enhance the legal rights of whistleblowers, and authorities receiving information must be discreet and wherever possible, maintain the whistleblower's anonymity.

Public disclosure laws have their limits, however. New whistle-blowing law in WA did not prevent a Health Department whistleblower's name being used extensively in Parliament in August.

Her treatment was a far cry from the respect and discretion that should be extended to anyone showing the courage to expose suspected fraud. Her case illustrates that public-disclosure laws do not necessarily deter the prevailing bullying culture of victimising whistleblowers.

We still need whistle-blowing law however. Crime itself provides an analogy. Just because people still commit crimes does not mean that the criminal code is ineffective.

Whistleblowers perform a valuable and essential public service. Without them, much corruption and impropriety would go undetected. Whether it's unions, churches, corporations or governments, people need to feel able to come forward when they encounter wrongdoing.

From the Democrats' perspective, the Cole Royal Commission legislation will provide another opportunity to push the whistle-blowing barrow.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Senator Andrew Murray is Taxation and Workplace Relations Spokesperson for the Australian Democrats and a Senator for Western Australia.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Andrew Murray
Related Links
Australian Democrats
Photo of Andrew Murray
Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy