Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Nanny State no substitute for parental responsibility

By Jeremy Sammut - posted Tuesday, 28 October 2008


The challenges associated with raising children are no different today. What is different is the level of welfare dependence and the social dysfunction this leads to. The Nanny Stater’s concerted campaign also creates elaborate excuses that abrogate parental responsibility. As the Stanley doco maintained, parents aren’t responsible if their child is obese because it’s all capitalism’s fault. Bad parents aren’t pressured to get their act together, but are given an easy out when keeping kids healthy is transformed into a government responsibility.

Outsourcing parenting to the government is ultimately self-defeating. This approach not only diminishes personal liberty and accelerates the growth of government. “Big government” interventions, just like welfare, also end up encouraging irresponsibility.

Blaming childhood obesity on the failure of government to “help” families manage health risks creates a vicious cycle. The more government tries to intervene in the lives of families, the more parental irresponsibility is excused and encouraged, and the more licence this gives the Nanny State to keep interfering, to no avail.

Advertisement

Every move in the direction of government action is really a step backwards. There is no substitute for expecting parents to do their job. Looking to government to prevent childhood obesity only entrenches parental irresponsibility.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

15 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jeremy Sammut is a Research Fellow at the Centre for Independent Studies. Jeremy has a PhD in history. His current research for the CIS focuses on ageing, new technology, and the sustainability of Medicare. Future research for the health programme will examine the role of preventative care in the health system and the management of public hospitals. His paper, A Streak of Hypocrisy: Reactions to the Global Financial Crisis and Generational Debt (PDF 494KB), was released by the CIS in December 2008. He is author of the report Fatally Flawed: the child protection crisis in Australia (PDF 341KB) published by the CIS in June 2009.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jeremy Sammut

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 15 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy