Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The wrong signal for Asia’s firing squads

By Tim Goodwin - posted Friday, 17 October 2008


Howard used this line many times to support executions in Indonesia, the United States and Iraq. The idea we would agree with a penalty simply because it was part of another country’s legal system showed a soft spot for post-modern cultural relativism that he never betrayed in his speeches on education and history.

In Howard’s case, his comments on the death penalty were more a matter of clarifying his position, inconsistent as it was. In Rudd’s case, it has been a slow retreat from his rhetoric in Opposition.

In October 2005, in the wrenching lead-up to the hanging of Australian citizen Nguyen Tuong Van in Singapore - as shadow minister for foreign affairs - he addressed Parliament in ringing tones. Rudd told members they were speaking to a clemency motion because they held “one fundamental human value to be true, and that is the intrinsic dignity of all human life”.

Advertisement

“For our policy to be credible, we must apply it universally,” he said. “We must be credible in our opposition to capital punishment as a matter of policy wherever it occurs, whether in the United States, China or Singapore.”

The day after Van Nguyen’s execution, Rudd again stressed it was important our policy on the death penalty was consistent. He said “whether we are talking about individuals in Iraq or Indonesia or elsewhere, our policy has to be consistent”.

Rudd, Deputy Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Minister for Foreign Affairs Stephen Smith have repeatedly said the Government would only intervene in cases involving Australian citizens.

This would be fine, if it was only a comment about when Australia makes diplomatic or political representations. But in practice it seemed to mean the government would only say a death sentence was inappropriate if an Australian was involved.

Now that Rudd has indicated his satisfaction the Bali bombers will get what’s coming to them, he has effectively said there are times when the death penalty is justified. He is giving a nod and wink to Indonesia to execute the bombers, while arguing only Australian citizens should be spared that punishment.

But he is taking us down one of two dead-ends. One is the argument that Australia and many Asian countries actually agree on the fundamental position that some people, and some crimes, deserve execution. All that is left is to politely disagree on where to draw the line.

Advertisement

The other is the more dangerous road of hypocrisy, where all representations from the Australian Government are dismissed as double standards and special pleading.

Asian countries are sensitive to being lectured by Western governments, but they are just as sensitive to the taint of hypocrisy in the positions taken by those same governments.

If Australia took a consistent position on the death penalty, it would not be committing itself to intervening in every case, including sending in diplomats to argue for the lives of terrorists who killed our people. And it is not megaphone diplomacy to state what Australia believes, as a matter of official policy.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

22 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Tim Goodwin has been involved in the human rights movement for more than 20 years. In 2000 he established Amnesty International Australia's anti-death penalty network, and he was the organisation's spokesperson on the death penalty until 2008. He writes the Asia Death Penaly blog, which hosts about 200 stories on developments in the death penalty in the Asian region.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tim Goodwin

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Tim Goodwin
Article Tools
Comment 22 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy