Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Pin-up children

By Melinda Tankard Reist - posted Tuesday, 29 July 2008


When the Senate inquiry into the sexualisation of children in the media was announced, those of us who had worked hard to point out that it wasn’t in the best interests of children to be treated as mini adults and sexual selling aids, welcomed it.

At last, we thought, our elected representatives think this issue warrants serious attention.

Child development experts, educators and women and girls’ advocacy groups, presented solid evidence on the damage done by encroaching on childhood with sexualised messaging in toys, clothing, music, games, magazines and billboards.

Advertisement

Psychologists and psychiatrists provided documentary evidence in their case notes and hospital statistics of worrying trends in child and adolescent health and child abuse.

They provided long lists of negative impacts including eating disorders, depression, anxiety, body image dissatisfaction, self-harm, low self esteem and children acting out sexually which they linked to the too-soon sexualisation of children.

The Australian Childhood Foundation told the committee that sexualising material: “… serves to normalise adult sexual themes to children. It provides no educational value and is compounded by other imagery and messages to which children are exposed … a contributing factor to the genesis of problem sexual behaviour is the increasing volume of sexualised imagery and themes available in popular culture and accessible to children.”

The Hon Alastair Nicholson, former Chief Justice of the Family Court, said the onus was on those engaging in this type of advertising and marketing to show it did no harm.

“The sort of values which this type of advertising encourages is hardly likely to advance the future welfare and development of children. It should therefore be strictly regulated as self regulation has obviously failed”, he told the committee.

It was hoped something would be done to rein in the behaviour of advertisers and marketers who see children as a gold mine to be plundered.

Advertisement

But the committee didn’t seem to think so. While proposing a couple of positive recommendations in its report, the committee seemed to forget that it was the poor behaviour of industry bodies that brought about the inquiry in the first place.

The committee recommended that the Advertising Standards Board (ASB) consider establishing a new “media and advertising complaints clearing house”. This is the same body criticised for not reflecting community standards, for its weak code of ethics, for being unrepresentative and for looking after its own interests.

The ASB has demonstrated that it’s not all that fond of complainants.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

25 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Melinda Tankard Reist is a Canberra author, speaker, commentator and advocate with a special interest in issues affecting women and girls. Melinda is author of Giving Sorrow Words: Women's Stories of Grief after Abortion (Duffy & Snellgrove, 2000), Defiant Birth: Women Who Resist Medical Eugenics (Spinifex Press, 2006) and editor of Getting Real: Challenging the Sexualisation of Girls (Spinifex Press, 2009). Melinda is a founder of Collective Shout: for a world free of sexploitation (www.collectiveshout.org). Melinda blogs at www.melindatankardreist.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Melinda Tankard Reist

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Melinda Tankard Reist
Article Tools
Comment 25 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy