Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Carbon coupons may be the way to go

By Andrew Laming - posted Monday, 7 July 2008


Unfortunately for Australia, our reliance on hand-picked but non expert economists is leading us down a very different post-Kyoto path. As if making up for lost time, we are racing to design a technically perfect carbon tax which faces evisceration by exemptions demanded by politicians. That could do more harm than good.

Many nations will struggle to sign up to a carbon tax for which the costs are large and uncertain. The impact on machinery and vehicle sectors, chemicals, metals, paper, plastics, agriculture and food will vary for each signatory. International carbon trading means external shocks are transmitted to other nations in a “zero-sum game”. Lastly, signatory nations have to churn carbon tax revenue back to compensate vulnerable citizens. This is a very impure science at the best of times.

Climate change’s rate-limiting steps are the giant developing economies. This week, China supported the election of Robert Mugabe at the UN. When one also considers China’s actions in Darfur, it is clear that self-interest still trumps altruism. For the other half of the world with incomes below $10 per day, there will be little appetite for adding a 20 cent carbon tax to fuel which is already subsidised.

Advertisement

Last century, 44 nations tried to fix the price of money to a gold standard at Bretton-Woods. They failed. Enforcing a global price for carbon will be even tougher. Elements of McKibbin’s proposal avoid the pitfalls of a global “cap and trade” and deserve urgent consideration. Unlike the gold standard, this time we don’t have the luxury of decades to urge imperfect administrations to adopt a perfect carbon tax.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Andrew Laming is the Federal Member for Bowman in Queensland and the Shadow Spokesperson Regional Health and Indigenous Health.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Andrew Laming

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Andrew Laming
Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy