Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Petroleum and progress

By Rodrigo Acuña - posted Friday, 13 June 2008


Those who did manage to get into a public hospital, had to bring their own bed sheets, gauze, surgical gloves, aspirins and food.

Now, there are more than 20,000 Cuban doctors and nurses working in newly built clinics, with hundreds of child care centres and schools under construction.

When Chávez's record on these issues has come under attack, the response has been swift and well-documented (PDF 184KB).

Advertisement

Throughout Latin America, Chávez's politics have gained Venezuela much support resulting in strong alliances with Argentina, Ecuador, Bolivia, the Dominican Republic, Nicaragua and Cuba.

These countries, with Uruguay, have jointly launched regional projects such as TeleSur - a television network which aims to counter US cultural hegemony - and the Union of South American Nations (UnaSur), intended as the equivalent of the European Union.

Many of these projects are unprecedented in Latin America. They have their problems, but are making progress - thus clashing with Washington's traditional relationship with the region. And since the US cannot simply replace a supplier of oil like Venezuela overnight, Caracas, for now, does have much room to manoeuvre.

On January 18, 2005, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, before the Senate of Foreign Relations Committee, described Chávez as a "negative force in the region", that ought to be "exposed", and insisted he be informed his "behaviour is really not acceptable".

Move beyond the sound bytes and Chávez's overly rhetorical style, and it's clear where Condoleezza Rice is really coming from. Based on the history of US-Venezuelan relations, if Chávez truly were a dictator, then Washington would have no trouble doing business with him.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

First published in ABC's Unleashed on May 19, 2008.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Rodrigo Acuña is a educator, writer and expert on Latin America. He has taught at various universities in Australia and has been writing for over ten years on Latin American politics. He currently work as an independent researcher and for the NSW Department of Education. He can be followed on Twitter @rodrigoac7.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Rodrigo Acuña

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy