Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Farewell the Clintons?

By Terry Flew - posted Thursday, 15 May 2008


The figures on the African-American vote are now quite staggering, with 92 per cent supporting Obama in North Carolina (which has a one-third African-American population) and 94 per cent in Indiana. Given that Bill Clinton as President was actually quite popular with African-Americans, it is indicative of the failures of the Hillary Clinton campaign that this margin has kept getting worse for her with successive primaries.

The following week has seen a slow leak of the “super delegates”, the 800-odd Democrat big-wigs who could overturn the primary vote on pledge delegates if they decide that someone is “unelectable”.

The question now is when, or whether, Hillary Clinton will concede to Barack Obama, and on what terms. Although she vows to fight on, it is no longer clear what for, as she could only become the Democrat nominee if the super delegates defy the popular vote. While doing so, however, the Democrats will continue to splinter along class and racial lines, with real opportunities for the Republicans and John McCain to pick up support from disaffected Hillary Clinton supporters.

Advertisement

The fact that Hilary Clinton has won West Virginia this week - a gun-owning, six-pack state if ever there was one - while Obama will win big in Oregon the following week, will only further the perception of the Democrats as a house divided.

As the Republicans have won seven of the last ten Presidential elections, the Democrats are prone to get skittish at such moments. The reality is that the 2008 Presidential election is very much theirs for the winning with a half-electable candidate with half-decent policies.

George W. Bush now has a 28 per cent approval rating, lower than that of Jimmy Carter during the hostage crisis in Iran, and less than half that of Bill Clinton when he left office. John McCain can only partly distance himself from the Bush years, as he is not overturning key policies of this period - on the war in Iraq, taxes or health care.

The gusto with which the right-wing culture warriors - O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck - are lining up to bash into Obama as a reckless, unpatriotic liberal is matched by a decided lack of enthusiasm for McCain, who is perceived as a closet moderate. Even the evangelical Christians are up for overtures from the Democrats this year, following large-scale defections from the Republican camp in the 2006 Congressional elections.

If Barack Obama is the Democratic Party nominee, the question of what happens to the Clintons is on the minds of many pundits. There is some talk of a “dream ticket” with Hillary Clinton as the Vice-Presidential nominee, in order to suture together the two fragmenting strands of Democrat support. But I think this is unlikely to happen, partly because, as one Republican advisor wittily observed on CNN, Obama would need to employ a food taster in the White House to check that nothing had been slipped into his soup.

Bill Clinton’s energetic performance on the campaign trail suggests that the would-be First Husband has no intention to step back from string pulling in the party, and would find it impossible to not involve himself in the affairs of state if he ever got near the White House again.

Advertisement

With an African-American candidate performing so strongly in the Democratic Party primaries, questions of race were going to feature more in the 2008 US Presidential election more than ever before. It is notable that the Republicans avoid the politics of racial polarisation at this stage, and may even change the equation if they nominated someone like Condoleezza Rice as Vice-Presidential nominee.

The major problem has been that Hillary Clinton has done so much in recent months to present herself as the candidate for “white America” that it has fostered divisiveness in a party that badly needs to be inclusive if it is to with the elections in November.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Terry Flew is Professor of Media and Communications at the Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. He is the author of Understanding Global Media (Palgrave 2007) and New Media: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2008). From 2006 to 2009, he has headed a project into citizen journalism in Australia through the Australian Research Council’s Linkage-Projects program, and The National Forum (publishers of On Line Opinion) have been participants in that project.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Terry Flew

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Terry Flew
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from QUT
 The science of reporting climate change
 Why schools need more than a business plan
 Suburban resilience
 Science unlimited
 Wake-up call for science
 More...
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy