Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Racism for the mainstream

By Mustafa Qadri - posted Friday, 9 May 2008


Writing in The Australian, Pipes argued Europe was in danger of losing its “distinct cultural” identity as the “global engine of change”. The danger comes from a growing European Muslim population and a lax approach to European heritage. His solution to this perceived danger is for Muslims to be more “Western” and less Muslim. This despite there being no consensus on what it means to be Western or Muslim. Moreover, many Muslims, including myself, have no qualms about being Muslim and Western.

Of course Daniel Pipes is not alone. One need only recall the respected scientist James Watson, who co-discovered DNA, and his belief that people of African origin are less intelligent than other human beings.

Watson revealed these sentiments during an interview published in The Sunday Times of London, where he remarked, “all our social policies [on Africa] are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing says not really … people who have to deal with black employees find this not true”.

Advertisement

His astonishing claims reach new heights when he warns, “there is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so.”

At first glance Watson’s sentiments sound informed, almost respectable. Like Pipes, some valid points are raised. But masked within the euphemisms and indirect speech is a classically racist argument: blacks (or Muslims, or whomsoever is targeted) are not just inferior to us in the West, but inherently so.

As researchers have known for some time, a good education is not always a barrier to racism. However, an educated racist has the capacity to lend credibility and nuance to the fear, latent in every society, of those who do not look or behave quite like “us”. This is not the racism of Pauline Hanson or soccer hooligans. It is far too dishonest for that kind of chauvinism. It is racism for the mainstream.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

116 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mustafa Qadri is a freelance journalist.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mustafa Qadri

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 116 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy