Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The fight for English

By Malcolm King - posted Friday, 7 March 2008


Standing in front of a new class I could not assume that any of the students had read George Eliot, Henry James, Joyce, Hemingway, Woolfe, White, Winton, Stephen King, Zadie Smith or Ian McEwin, to name just a few. When I asked them why they were here they said they wanted to be writers. It was like wanting to be a brain surgeon but not being interested in brains.

My job was not to teach English. My job was to teach professional writing. There are school teachers far more capable people than me, armed with zest and imagination, that could impart the mystery and joy of reading and performing Shakespeare, Beckett or Berkoff.

Jonathan Swift is up-roaringly funny. He's a poke in the eye for the establishment. Chaucer is preoccupied with drinking and sex. Why not? And after reading the poetry of Andrew Marvell, well, he wouldn't be the first choice of a date for your daughter. And they're not even the good bits.

Advertisement

All of that stuff should have already been taught. We need a national teaching curriculum. It should provide students with the ability to write and argue in a logical and coherent manner.

Any future school curriculum needs to arm students not with relativistic twaddle but to draw their own conclusions about some of the best writing in the history of literature. Then let the students make up their own minds if it's any good. At the moment, to quote F.R. Leavis, many kids aren't saying anything intelligible.

It's not that they haven't got anything to say. Far from it. They simply lack the tools to express themselves.

If they can explain in a logical and concise way why the screenwriting behind the “tooth and fang” e-games trumps the dramatic writing of C.S. Forester, then more power to them.

A recent survey by Canberra based academic Andrew Leigh concludes, “troubling new evidence suggests that literacy and numeracy scores have stagnated or fallen since the 1970s despite the doubling of resources”.

Commonwealth and state governments can throw all the money they like at a system that is churning out semi-literates and semi-numerates but in my experience, much of the money is spent on IT development rather than helping students write comprehensible content.

Advertisement

Allow me to digress. There are serious issues with the push in some schools to replace texts with online books. Quoted recently in the Adelaide Sunday Mail, Ms Trudy Sweeney, president of Computers in Education Group SA said, “The curriculum recognises that it's important to have authentic tasks, which means their learning shouldn't just be out of a text book in isolation of the world”.

In the same news story, Dr Robert Fitzgerald, a research fellow in ICT at Canberra University said, “Publishers are realising that, whether it's in schools or universities, it's hard to convince students to buy those big heavy books”.

In isolation of the world? Where does she think these kids live?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

An edited version of this article was first published in Adelaide's Advertiser on February 23, 2008.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

42 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Malcolm King is a journalist and professional writer. He was an associate director at DEEWR Labour Market Strategy in Canberra and the senior communications strategist at Carnegie Mellon University in Adelaide. He runs a writing business called Republic.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Malcolm King

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 42 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy