When Wollongong City Council was sacked this week, it gained the dubious honour of being the eighth council to be dismissed in NSW within the past five years. This is an embarrassing record for the tier of government that is supposed to be the closest to its constituents. The federal government in far-away Canberra has been sacked only once.
The Wollongong council scandal has everything: sex, bribery and an impersonation of a corruption watchdog officer. But, most of all, Wollongong council has inadvertently highlighted the deep problems with local government administration across the country. Compared with other levels of government, there is little accountability and scrutiny of local government. It is no wonder it often makes expensive mistakes and is susceptible to corruption.
Part of the fault lies in the sorts of people who are drawn to council office. Local government politics tends to attract those excited by the machinations and manipulations of political life but disinterested in public policy.
There is one good thing to be said for politicians motivated by ideological fervour: at least they want the best for their constituents.
Too many people stand for local government with little interest in responsible governing.
As Wollongong has been virtually a one-party city for the better part of a century, it is little more than a sandpit for Labor's factional warfare.
A main cause of the corruption in local government is the often cited problem of lack of transparency and accountability. Few media organisations are interested in the day to day goings-on of individual councils, at least until a corruption watchdog puts a councillor in front of a judge.
Free from the close scrutiny that federal and state governments are subject to, councils are free to follow their whims. It is perhaps indicative that some of the earliest casualties of the sub-prime crisis have been local government investment portfolios.
If the market had not so spectacularly imploded during the past few months, NSW's Wingecarribee Shire Council would never have been asked why it was investing in mortgages in Houston and Orlando.
One possible remedy for this sense that corruption is endemic in councils has been raised by the Queensland Local Government Association: politicians would be less likely to accept bribes and gifts from property developers if there were more extensive scrutiny of political donations.
This echoes Kevin Rudd's declaration yesterday that the federal Government plans to drastically limit campaign donations in the name of good government.
Limiting political donations creates its own problems, not least that doing so tends to favour incumbent politicians who are able to harness the full resources of their government.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
16 posts so far.