Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Boys and guns

By Peter West - posted Friday, 11 January 2008


Despite many academic articles, a gap between boys and girls’ achievement remains. Among low achievers in the UK, boys outnumber girls by 20 per cent. A gender gap in achievement between boys and girls has been discussed in Australia since the O’Doherty report, Challenges and Opportunities, was released in New South Wales in 1994. Last year the subject rose to prominence in the USA and is still being hotly debated.

The UK report says too many boys develop negative images of themselves as learners, in part because of learning that is not purposeful. The report argues that schools and childcare centres want pupils to listen patiently, speak nicely and (as they grow older) write attractive descriptions. These are exactly the things most boys find the hardest.

Boys’ natural exuberance and energy may often be misinterpreted. Thus boys can be labelled as difficult and their behaviour called “inappropriate”. Boys are not seen as positive learners and they become fed up with learning as such. If their interests and learning preferences are not respected, they lose interest in formal learning and switch off. In contrast, a project which followed boys’ interests  found sudden, dramatic improvements in their speaking and listening skills AND behaviour.

Boys cited in the report said that sitting on the carpet was boring, and “it wastes your life”.The issue was summarised when one British boy wrote in an exam, “I will try my hardest, no matter how pointless the task is”. Following boys’ agendas does improve learning, the report says. Staff should “help boys to achieve more rapidly by providing opportunities for learning that engage them”.

Advertisement

Engaging boys in schoolwork has been discussed in all countries surveyed by the OECD’s PISA Report. Emphatically, boys are not all the same. But the problem of capturing boys’ interests has been registered in almost all countries surveyed by the OECD and it keeps cropping up in unexpected places. Only last week I was asked by a theatre in London “How on earth do we engage the boys who visit us?”

There will be many implications from the report. For instance, do we have enough men in teaching? Professor Andrew Martin at Oxford University told me that although teacher quality is paramount, boys prefer to raise certain issues with a trusted older male, not always a father. And males often tolerate more active and boyish learning, Sebastian Kraemer argues. Yet getting suitable males into teaching has been oft-discussed, but no workable solution has been found.

Perhaps the report follows a trend back to more boy - and girl - specific learning. It might encourage a move back to single-sex learning, even within a coeducational school.

There are some echoes of the report in the work done to date by the Federal Government’s Boys Education Lighthouse Schools Program. Among its ten principles for engaging boys appear the following: flexibility of approach, rather than a standard, teacher-directed activity; practical and hands-on learning; and the use of appropriate male role-models. Like the UK report, the BELS program wants teachers and caregivers not to enforce stereotypes but to challenge them. The balance among all these principles is difficult to maintain.

The report is not a sensational call encouraging boys to be aggressive in childcare centres and the early years of school. It is a cautious call encouraging questioning of caregivers’ understandable anxiety about the ways in which many boys play. It might spark a useful debate on what is permissible in the early years and how to channel the restless activity that many boys show.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

47 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Peter West is a well-known social commentator and an expert on men's and boys' issues. He is the author of Fathers, Sons and Lovers: Men Talk about Their Lives from the 1930s to Today (Finch,1996). He works part-time in the Faculty of Education, Australian Catholic University, Sydney.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter West

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Peter West
Article Tools
Comment 47 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy