Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Take two aspirins and call for more reform

By Adam Johnston - posted Tuesday, 8 January 2008


Kevin Cox is to be congratulated for promoting the concept of a health savings account. However, establishing an account and diverting tax cuts into it is only the beginning of reform. Many related initiatives need to be put in place otherwise people may see the account as delivering something akin to Paul Keating’s equally infamous L.A.W. tax cuts.

First, many people have a justifiable degree of cynicism about private health funds. They see premiums rise, but are often dismayed at the level of return they receive when making a claim, after which there can still be considerable medical bills to pay.

If health funds had to submit applications for approval of premium increases to the independent Australian Competition and Consumer Commission to make a ruling on, rather than the Health Minister, then an element of the political controversy could be taken out of the debate on public health.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the government could also weight its health insurance rebate. This would mean that the lower your income, the greater the rebate for maintaining private health coverage. Indeed, a parallel might be drawn with the superannuation co-contribution scheme for low income earners.

Furthermore, the proposal could be expanded to become a part public-part private coverage mix. Where an individual was prepared to purchase some health services privately, but could not afford a complete package, they could still attract rebates and, where possible, referral between the public system and private service providers. This would help to meet those health needs people could not cover themselves, as efficiently as possible.

This option sets up a definite reward system for those prepared to take control of their health and offers at least a partial alternative to remaining on a long public waiting list.

The concept of mixing and matching services could also be extended to the private health funds themselves. At present, customers purchase private insurance from a company, which presents them with a health insurance package. There may be a few optional extras and a few gimmicks to get you to join, such as free gym shoes, but ultimately the insurer wants you to sign a contact and pay a premium. Would it not give consumers more power if they (or brokers they hired) mixed and matched packages and premiums according to an individual client’s needs? Therefore, I could purchase optical cover from one company, dental from a second and surgical from a third, in much the same way as many Australians keep a portfolio of investments.

Equally, if consumers could elect to take part of their Medicare Levy and put it in their own long-term health savings account, this could make providing their own “health future” more attractive.

While some may say this strikes at the heart of the universal nature of Medicare, this supposedly communal, egalitarian system has a dark side. This dark side is the fact that the greatest impact of the Medicare Levy is felt by workers on the lowest incomes. No less than the head of Access Economics Geoff Carmody has labeled the Levy a flat tax which, when means-tested exemptions are clawed back, amounts to an effective 20 per cent tax on low income earners.

Advertisement

This cannot possibly be fair and workers on low incomes should be the first to get the 20 per cent tax back in their health savings accounts.

Furthermore, in the same speech to the National Press Club where he explained the real cost of the Medicare Levy, Mr Carmody also made a compelling call for wide-ranging tax reform, which would have seen a rise in the minimum tax bracket, abolition of most allowable deductions, along with a uniform rate of both personal and company tax.

Such steps would simplify the tax system while also putting money back in taxpayers’ pockets. A percentage of this sum could also be ear-marked for the health savings account or alternatively, incentives could be offered for individuals to make voluntary contributions to their account of pre-tax dollars, mimicking the salary sacrifice arrangements available for superannuation now.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

The views expressed here are his own and do not reflect the opinions of any other individual or organisation. Rather, the article is an amalgam of his ideas, provided to inquiries undertaken by the Fair Pay Commission (PDF 57KB) and the Productivity Commission (PDF 27KB) and are offered in response to Dr Kevin Coxs article.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Adam Johnston is a solicitor and is undertaking a Masters by Research in law at the University of New England, Armidale. He has had a long term interest in health policy and has served on a variety of consultative and community advisory committees in the health sector.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Adam Johnston
Related Links
A new way to fund health - On Line Opinion

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Adam Johnston
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy