Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Unions, human rights and God

By Chris Perkins - posted Monday, 3 December 2007


The spirit of individualism thrives on fear. It thrives on turning one against another. It thrives on keeping secrets in individual contracts and keeping workers looking over their shoulders.

There’s nothing about that in what Pope John Paul II and Archbishop Pell had to say about working life and unions. There’s clearly nothing like that in what the mostly conservative-centre governments had to say in the Declaration of Human Rights. And there’s certainly no hint of it when Jesus said, “When ever two or three of you gather, there I am with you”.

In other words something special happens when humans gather and work together - not alone.

Advertisement

But make no mistake the Howard government understood collectivism very well. In fact it supported it. No problem it seems with the Australian Medical Association - a collective for doctors; no problem it seems with the Law Society - a collective for lawyers; no problem it seems with the Business Council of Australia and Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry - both collectives for Australian business; no problem it seems with the various farming co-operatives and the National Farmers’ Federation - collectives for farmers and agricultural conglomerates.

So, there’s not a problem with collectivism as such - it’s all good for doctors, lawyers, businesses and farming conglomerates. It’s just a certain type of collectivism that’s a problem. It’s collectives for ordinary, everyday working people that it doesn’t like. Why are collectives OK for doctors, lawyers and businesses, but not miners, truckies, construction workers, casual women cleaners, child care workers, shop assistants, clerks, teachers, nurses, government workers and the like?

Collectives work alright - that’s why union workers are paid on average more than those on individual contracts. That’s why about half the new AWAs have been found to be unfair - even by the government’s own unfair standards.

Collectives work because we are human beings. We do our best work when we act together.

We always have and we always will.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

23 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Chris Perkins is a former Secretary of the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance and a public affairs consultant with a number of unions among his client list.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 23 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy