Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Pulp the other one!

By Roger Hanney - posted Thursday, 6 September 2007


Greens Senator Christine Milne, on the other hand, properly foresaw the current outcome during an interview in March this year:

Malcolm Turnbull has to conduct an assessment and that has to include the impacts on listed threatened species … on the forests, as well as [on] the marine environment. That is likely to take much longer than the three months that is Gunns’ ultimatum. The cronyism and secrecy that has gone on in Tasmania and the complete abrogation of proper process means that it’s now fairly and squarely a Federal election issue.

And even now, another vitally critical flaw in Gunns’ proposal has been largely overlooked.

Advertisement

Professionals and observers experienced in the practicalities of pulp manufacture most regularly confirm two facts - all kraft pulp mills stink, and all kraft pulp mills are very complex systems which need to be run by highly skilled, experienced specialists.

Tasmania’s Greenest Pulp Mill - nothing supports the claim that it will be the World’s Greenest, other than the paintjob in the artist’s rendition - currently lacks permanent, dedicated management positions to ensure that lax “where practicable” outcomes in the state permits are achieved.

But even with the foreman already named and PR assurance from John Howard that the current six-week delay by Malcolm Turnbull is just that - a delay - Gunns don’t yet have a team of dedicated environmental professionals that will keep all emissions and impacts in check. Presumably this is because Lennon’s permit - proof that greenies, journos, and the 65 per cent of Tasmanians are hysterical and confused - permits it. As Gunns famously helped write the 1,100 pages of permits and the people’s parliamentary representatives were prohibited from amending them, these facts suggest that Gunns themselves see no need to mandate such critical appointments.

As for confused journos, Ashbarry furphies that RFAs (Regional Forest Agreements) exist and that this not only proves that Tassie forests are being sustainably managed, but the Federal Court has confirmed this. What he actually means is that in the Wielangta Case last year, the Federal Court found that forestry practices in one area being tested in Tasmania were in breach of Australia’s principal environmental law and had invalidated the protection afforded to Forestry Tasmania under the RFA. Coincidentally, as a Party joining Forestry Tasmania in this case, the Commonwealth Government rewrote crucial elements of all the laws involved and as such may yet have reason for optimism about their appeal.

Tasmanian forestry - the hypocritical publicly subsidised woodchip industry which claims to be about “timber” and “community” and screams bloody murder at the thought of its activities being politicised - may not change everything … but it sure hits the spot for the current generation of Australian legislators, and it is certainly governing Tasmania.

In case you mythed it.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

8 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Roger Hanney is an acudetox and shiatsu practitioner completing a Masters in Environmental Law at Sydney University. Biodiversity, international law, legal research and public interest litigation are longstanding areas of interest. He is the environment editor for Sydney City Hub, and for the Tasmanian Times, New Matilda, and Big Issue if they let him.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Roger Hanney

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Roger Hanney
Article Tools
Comment 8 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy