Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Australia’s nuclear future

By Helen Caldicott - posted Thursday, 2 August 2007


But this is a vacuous plan because only 10 per cent of the plutonium is converted to fission products while 90 per cent remains. This deadly radioactive mixture then must be cooled, transported, stored and isolated from the environment virtually for ever at enormous expense.

Presently only China, France, Japan and Russia are included in the US GNEP plan, but clearly Australia is involved because Howard is about to repeal federal legislation banning uranium enrichment, nuclear power and the reprocessing of spent fuel in Australia.

This suspicion is confirmed by the following facts. According to journalist Julie Macken, Dr John White, chairman of Howard’s Uranium Industry Framework UIF, head of the Australian waste company Global Renewables, and his colleagues have spent $45 million of their own money creating the Australian Nuclear Fuel Leasing company (ANFL) which is to facilitate and manage uranium enrichment, fuel fabrication, leasing, transport and storage in Australia of 15 to 20 per cent of the world’s radioactive nuclear waste.

Advertisement

This foreign nuclear waste will, according to White, be shipped to Darwin and then sent on the Halliburton-Serco railway line to be cooled for decades and then stored in the Australian outback for ever more.

The question which begs an answer is this. GNEP is to be handled only by politically stable countries, but given the radiological life and proliferation properties of plutonium how long can political stability be guaranteed?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Helen Caldicott will address a public forum in the Brisbane City Hall on August 8, 2007. Australia at the Crossroads- A New Direction 6.30pm for a 7pm start. Free admission.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

167 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Helen Caldicott, has devoted the last 38 years to an international campaign to educate the public about the medical hazards of the nuclear age and the necessary changes in human behavior to stop environmental destruction. She is also the Founding President of the Physicians for Social Responsibility which, with other national groups won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1985. She is President of people for a Nuclear Free Australia and a member of the Spanish Scientific Committee advising the Spanish Prime Minister.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Helen Caldicott

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Helen Caldicott
Article Tools
Comment 167 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy